Epidemiology of demonstrable leptospirosis: educational intervention proposal
Keywords:
Leptospirosis, Epidemiology.Abstract
Introduction: leptospirosis is a disease caused by the pathogenic leptospira bacteria remaining in the renal tubules of certain animals.Objective: To define a proposed educational intervention defined as risk of leptospirosis in the town of Guane in the period January 2011 to December 2012.
Material and methods: a descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Guane. The target group was represented by a total of 448 patients diagnosed with leptospirosis (for clinical, epidemiological evidence of exposure and laboratory results). The total universe took between 18 and 75 years old. Variables such as age, sex and clinical picture were studied; epidemiological risk factors, occupation, protection measures and sources of infection were studied.
Results: probable cases of leptospirosis were characterized in the health area of Guane, clinical-epidemiological and serological evidence of this entity is provided, and the main risk factors associated with the disease were identified.
Conclusions: the development of research generated a positive impact on both health workers and the population at risk of leptospirosis, with the proposed educational intervention.
Downloads
References
1. Marcano Pasquier RJ. Cuidado con la leptospirosis! [Internet]. Venezuela: 2013. Disponible en: http://www.medicinapreventiva.com.ve/articulos/leptospirosis.htm
2. Fernández Molina Carmen, Obregón Fuentes Ana Margarita. Tercer Taller y Tercera Reunión Científica Internacional ¨Leptospirosis Habana 2006. Rev Cubana Med Trop [revista en la Internet]. 2007 Abr [citado 2014 enero 25]; 59(1): Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0375-07602007000100001&lng=es
3. García Portela R. Leptospirosis Humana. La Habana: Editorial Científico Técnica; 2009: 20-35.
4. Perolat P, Barauton G. Leptospira interrogans et al leptospirose. Bull. Inst. Pasteur. 1990; 88: 315-33.
5. Rozman C. Compendio de Medicina Interna. Madrid; Harcount Brace; 1997: 766. 68.
6. Cristóbal Tassera E, Maren H. Human leptospirosis in Bulgaria; epidemiological, clinical and serological factures. Scard. J irfect dis. 2003; 35 (11-12): 3869-72.
7. Green-McKenzie J. Leptospirosis in Emergency Medicine Treatment & Management[Internet]. Medscape; 2012. Disponible en: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/788751-treatment
8. Leal Castellares CB, Garcia Suárez R, Gonzalez- Figuroa E, Fuentesallen JL, Escobido- De la Dera J. Risk factors and the prevalence of leptospirosis infection in a rural communitarian of Chiapas, México. Epidemiol infect. 2003; 131(13): 1149-56.
9. Cuba, Ministerio de Salud Pública. Dirección Nacional de Epidemiologia. Programa nacional de control de la Leptospirosis Humana. La Habana: MINSAP; 1998.
10. García Álvarez. Diagnóstico clínico de la leptospirosis en el Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Comandante Pinares de San Cristóbal. Trabajo para optar por el titulo Maestría en Enfermedades Infecciosas. Pinar del Río: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas; 2006.
11. Montesino C. Estratificación del riesgo de leptospirosis en el municipio pinareño de San Luis. Rev Cubana Enfermer. 2005; 21(3).
12. Montesino Valdez C, Arocha Buijo EO. Comportamiento de la leptospirosis humana. Rev cubana Enfermer. 2001; 17(3): 168-72.
13. Hernández Suárez M, Rodríguez Menéndez G. Leptosposis en adultos de una provincia cubana. Rev Mex medicina interna. 2006; 73 (1):14-17.

Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/