Criterios de los estudiantes sobre la calidad del proceso docente educativo en cirugía. 2006-2007 The Student's Opinions on The Quality of The Educational Teaching Process in Surgery. 2006-2007
Abstract
Se realizó un estudio con el objetivo de determinar los principales factores que afectan el desarrollo del proceso docente educativo en la rotación de cirugía en el cuarto año de la carrera de Medicina de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río en el curso 2006-2007. Se seleccionó una muestra al azar de 55 estudiantes que representan el 85,9 % de la matrícula del semestre, a los cuales se les aplicó una encuesta que incluía 9 variables referidas a: cumplimiento de tiempos electivos y exámenes de premio, actualización científica de los contenidos y vías de actualización, papel de las actividades prácticas y la educación en el trabajo en la adquisición de habilidades, disponibilidad de literatura docente, así como valoración integral del proceso. Los datos fueron procesados a través del método porcentual aritmético utilizando además análisis de correlación para variables independientes (estadígrafo P de Pearson), y la prueba de comparación de dos y K- proporciones de grupos independientes. Se demostró que aunque existen deficiencias con el desarrollo del proceso docente, el grado de satisfacción con elmismo es adecuado.
Palabras clave: PROCESO DOCENTE-EDUCATIVO, ESTUDIANTES DE MEDICINA, ESCUELAS MÉDICAS, PRÁCTICA PROFESIONAL.
ABSTRACT
A study is carried out at determining the principal factors obstructing the development of the educational teaching process in fourth degree of Medicine Major at Medicine School in Pinar del Rio during 2006 _ 2007. A sample of 55 students was selected at random accounting for 85,9 % of the total. The were surveyed including 9 variables related to the fulfillment of optional times and rewarding examinations, scientific updating of contents and update means, the role of practical activities and the education for developing skills, the availability of teaching literature as well as the whole evaluation of the process. Data were processed using the arithmetic percentage method using the co relational study as the comparison test with two and K proportions in non-dependant groups. Although deficiencies in the teaching process development exist, it was demonstrated satisfaction is appropriate.
Key words: TEACHING PROCESS, STUDENTS OF MEDICINE, MEDICAL SCHOOLS, PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/
