Profesoral Competence of Methodologists on the Resolutions that Regulate the Educative Teaching Process
Abstract
In order to study the competence of methodologists concerning the regulations that regulate the development of the Educative Teaching Process, a study was carried out at Ernesto Che Guevara de la Serna Medical School in Pinar del Río. The universe consisted of 120 methodologists working in the different areas, including the central facilities. 75 evaluated students were taken as a sample in the first convocation and they were similarly distributed in every territory and covering every training scenario (68% of evaluated students). An evaluative instrument consisted of 5 questions with short answers containing the following resolutions: 3, 5, 15, 45, 105, and showing items on register and enrollment, organization of the teaching programs, methodological work and evaluation. Data were processed using the percentage arithmetical method linking the outcomes of the study, teaching category and scenario where the methodologists work.It was demonstrated that the level of training on the resolutions is not satisfactory, being the methodological work and evaluation the most difficult themes with a similar behavior in the study and teaching category.Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/