Pedagogical preparation for the Nursing-Specialty Professors in the design of evaluation instruments
Keywords:
Medical education, Nursing, Educational measurement.Abstract
Introduction: the assessment of pedagogical training together with the development of teaching competences that should characterize the professors is a social demand of first order, which should be in agreement with the model of health professionals the current society requires.Objective: to characterize the pedagogical training of the Nursing-Specialty Professors in the design of evaluation instruments in the Republic of Venezuela during 2010.
Methods: a descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out comprising 20 professors who belonged to the Academic Committees (the target group and the sample coincided). Theoretical, empiric and statistical methods allowed the study of the problem.
Results: the totality of professors polled had teaching experience, prevailing instructors, and 95% had attended to a pedagogy course or to courses of evaluation or quality of written-evaluation instruments, the majority were aware of the difficulties they presented in the design of the type of questions following the established requisites, in the selection of the type of questions according to the contents, and in the design of tables of contents.
Conclusions: professors of Nursing Studies, despite their teaching experience, teaching rank and/or training courses passed, pedagogical preparation is required to design evaluation instruments in order to improve quality.
Downloads
References
1. Núñez R N, Palacios C. P. La superación docente continua: algunos criterios para su perfeccionamiento. [sitio en Internet] Perú. [27 agosto 2012] Disponible en: http://www.campus.oei.org/revista/deloslectores/771Nunez.PDF
2. Sanz Cabrera T, Rodríguez Pérez ME. El enfoque histórico –cultural: su contribución a una concepción pedagógica contemporánea en: Tendencias pedagógicas en la realidad educativa actual. CEPES Bolivia; 2000.
3. Sotolongo Nogueira M, Rivera Michelena N, Blanco Horta F. Desarrollo de competencias para la gestión docente en la educación medica superior. [2004 junio 5]: [4 pantallas]. Disponible en URL: http:// bvs.sld.cu/revistas/ems/vol17_3_03/ems04303.htm
4. Alonso Reyes R, Cabrera N, Estévez O, Jiménez G, Limaya G, Barba M. La evaluación del aprendizaje usando las actividades de Moodle. [artículo en línea]. 2005 [citado 13 Jun 2009]; [aprox. 5p.]. Disponible en: http://www.formatex.org/micte2005/68.pdf
5. Molnar G. La evaluación en el ámbito educativo. Concepto de evaluación aplicada. [artículo en línea]. 2001 [citado 10 Jun 2009]; [aprox. 3p.]. Disponible en: http://www.colfem.com/rector/concepto.html
6. Soler Huerta E, Sabido Sighler C, Sainz Vázquez L, Mendoza Sánchez H, Gil Alfaro I, González Solis R. Confiabilidad de un instrumento para evaluar aptitud clínica en residentes de medicina familiar. Archivos en Medicina Familiar 2005; 7(001): 14-17. [artículo en línea]. 2005 [citado 13 Jun 2009]; [aprox. 5p.]. Disponible en: http:// redalyc/Vaemex.mx.
7. Salas Perea RS. Planeamiento de un examen: Lecturas seleccionadas. En [CD-ROM] Material de estudio de la Maestría de Educación Médica. Escuela Nacional de Salud Pública La Habana; 2005.
8. Salas Perea RS. Evaluación del aprendizaje: Lecturas seleccionadas. En [CD-ROM]. Material de estudio de la Maestría de Educación Médica. Escuela Nacional de Salud Pública La Habana; 2005.
9. Cáceres Mesa M, Cañedo Iglesias CM. Fundamentos teóricos para la implementación de la didáctica en el proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje. [artículo en línea]. 2009 [citado 2 Mar 2009]; [aprox. 5p.]. Disponible en: http://www.eumed.net/libros/2008b/395/LOS%20INSTRUMENTOS%20DE%20EVALUACION%20DEL%20APRENDIZAJE.htm
10. Salas Perea RS. Exámenes escritos: Lecturas seleccionadas. En [CD-ROM] Material de estudio de la Maestría de Educación Médica. Escuela Nacional de Salud Pública La Habana; 2005.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/
