Analysis of impression-taking techniques in removable partial dentures
Keywords:
PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS, PRINTING, REHABILITATION, DENTISTRY, DECISION MAKING.Abstract
Introduction: the success of a removable partial denture depends on several factors, among which the impression taking is one of the most important for the elaboration of the prosthesis.
Objective: to describe the different techniques for taking impressions in removable partial dentures.
Methods: a bibliographic review was carried out by means of an information search in the databases PubMed/MedLine, Scopus, SciELO and Redalyc. The terms used for the search strategy were "Dental impression", "Impression techniques", "Removable Partial Prosthesis", "Functional impression" related by means of AND and OR operators.
Development: the materials for the realization of partial prostheses must meet a group of physical-chemical properties that guarantee zero toxicity to the patient and high comfort, functionality and durability. Among the main materials are Alginate, polyethers, polyvinylsiloxanes, alginate substitutes and fast setting elastomeric materials. The main techniques are the full single tray technique, modified model impression, overprinting or pick-up and CAD/CAM system impression.
Conclusions: the rehabilitation of partial edentulism by means of a removable partial prosthesis is one of the most required procedures in dentistry in general; that is why it is necessary to master the materials and techniques available to make decisions when fabricating it.
Downloads
References
1. Jayaraman S, Kirubakaran R. Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2018 [citado 06/05/2023]; 4(4): CD012256. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29617037/
2. Costa J dos S. La salud oral y el bienestar funcional de los ancianos portugueses institucionalizados [Tesis]. Universidad de Salamanca; 2014 [citado 06/05/2023]. Available from: https://gredos.usal.es/handle/10366/125505
3. De Kok IJ, Cooper LF, Guckes AD, McGraw K, Wright RF, Barrero CJ, et al. Factors Influencing Removable Partial Denture Patient‐Reported Outcomes of Quality of Life and Satisfaction: A Systematic Review. J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2017 [citado 06/05/2023]; 26(1): 5–18. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopr.12526
4. Oh KC, Jeon J, Kim J-H. Fabrication of a removable partial denture combining conventional and digital techniques. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2021 [citado 06/05/2023]; 125(4): 588–91. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022391320301402
5. López Hernández DlM, Rodríguez Castillo D, Espinosa Tejeda NdlM. Materiales de impresión de uso estomatológico. Revista 16 de abril [Internet]. 2018 [citado 06/05/2023]; 57(267). Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=81314
6. Aviles Henriquez MK. Tecnica de impresión dental con alginato en protesis parcial metalica removible [Tesis]. Universidad de Guayaquil. Facultad Piloto de Odontología; 2017 [citado 06/05/2023]. Disponible en: http://repositorio.ug.edu.ec/handle/redug/21594
7. Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental Impression Materials and Techniques. Dent Clin North Am [Internet]. 2017 [citado 06/05/2023]; 61(4): 779–96. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28886768
8. Sotelo Tornero CA. Impresiones en prótesis dental: materiales y técnicas [Tesis]. Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega; 2017 [citado 06/05/2023]. Disponible en: http://repositorio.uigv.edu.pe/handle/20.500.11818/1574
9. Stober T, Bermejo JL, Rues S, Rammelsberg P. Wear of resin denture teeth in partial removable dental prostheses. J Prosthodont Res [Internet]. 2020 [citado 06/05/2023]; 64(1): 85–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31085073
10. Saeed F, Muhammad N, Khan AS, Sharif F, Rahim A, Ahmad P, et al. Prosthodontics dental materials: From conventional to unconventional. Mater Sci Eng C [Internet]. 2020 [citado 06/05/2023]; 106: 110167. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0928493118331795
11. Torrecilla Venegas R, Hierrezuelo Fuentes L, Rodríguez-López M. Hidrocoloide irreversible o alginato como material de impresión de uso estomatológico. Rev Estud HolCien [Internet]. 2021 [citado 06/05/2023]; 2(1):e55. Available from: https://revholcien.sld.cu/index.php/holcien/article/view/55
12. Aldana Sepúlveda H, Garzón Rayo H. Toma de impresiones en prótesis fija: implicaciones periodontales. Av Odontoestomatol [Internet]. 2016 [citado 06/05/2023]; 32(2): 83-95. Available from: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852016000200003&lng=en.
13. Gupta R, Brizuela M. Dental Impression Materials. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [citado 06/05/2023]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574496/
14. Cervino G, Cicciù M, Biondi A, Bocchieri S, Herford AS, Laino L, et al. Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Third Molar Extraction: Systematic Review of Recent Data. Antibiot (Basel, Switzerland) [Internet]. 2019 [citado 06/05/2023]; 8(2): e53. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31052566
15. Schmidt A, Häussling T, Rehmann P, Schaaf H, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of various impression materials and methods for two implant systems: An effect size study. J Prosthodont Res [Internet]. 2018 [citado 06/05/2023]; 62(2): 245–51. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29191609/
16. Baldissara P, Koci B, Messias AM, Meneghello R, Ghelli F, Gatto MR, et al. Assessment of impression material accuracy in complete-arch restorations on four implants. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2021 [citado 06/05/2023]; 126(6):763-771. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.10.017.
17. Gothwal G, Meena S, Padiyar UN, Sharma HK, Kaurani P, Singh DP. Comparative evaluation of elastic recovery of three different elastomeric impression materials on chemical disinfection and autoclaving: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc [Internet]. 2019 [citado 06/05/2023]; 19(4): 345–52. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31649444/
18. Al-Ansari A. Which final impression technique and material is best for complete and removable partial dentures? Evid Based Dent [Internet]. 2019 [citado 06/05/2023]; 20(3): 70–1. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-019-0039-0
19. Sayed M, Jain S. Comparison Between Altered Cast Impression and Conventional Single-Impression Techniques for Distal Extension Removable Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review. Int J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2019 [citado 06/05/2023]; 32(3): 265–71. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31034543
20. AlRumaih HS. Clinical Applications of Intraoral Scanning in Removable Prosthodontics: A Literature Review. J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2021 [citado 06/05/2023]; 30(9): 747–62. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopr.13395
21. Montero J. A Review of the Major Prosthetic Factors Influencing the Prognosis of Implant Prosthodontics. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2021 [citado 06/05/2023]; 10(4): 816. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/4/816
22. Carneiro Pereira AL, Bezerra de Medeiros AK, de Sousa Santos K, Oliveira de Almeida E, Seabra Barbosa GA, Porto Carreiro AdF. Accuracy of CAD-CAM systems for removable partial denture framework fabrication: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [Internet]. 2021 [citado 06/05/2023]; 125(2): 241-248. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.003.
23. Takaichi A, Fueki K, Murakami N, Ueno T, Inamochi Y, Wada J, et al. A systematic review of digital removable partial dentures. Part II: CAD/CAM framework, artificial teeth, and denture base. J Prosthodont Res [Internet]. 2022 [citado 06/05/2023]; 66(1): 53–67. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpr/66/1/66_JPR_D_20_00117/_article/-char/ja/
24. Pordeus MD, Santiago Junior JF, Venante HS, Bringel da Costa RM, Chappuis Chocano AP, Porto VC. Computer-aided technology for fabricating removable partial denture frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2022 [citado 06/05/2023]; 128(3): 331–40. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022391320303966
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/