Microhardness of three nanohybrid composite resins according to polishability
Keywords:
RESIN, HARDNESS, DENTAL POLISHING, COMPOSITE.Abstract
Introduction: minimally invasive dentistry is currently a new paradigm supported by scientific evidence-based dentistry.
Objective: to determine the surface hardness of three nano hybrid resins in relation to their polishing moment.
Methods: 60 resin discs were made according to ISO 4049 and we placed resin, divided into 3 groups of 20 each. One group of Filtek Z350 nanohybrid resin, a second group of Tetric N ceram resin and another of Brilliant resin. Half of each group was polished immediately and the other half 24 hours after polymerization. The Vickers microhardness was determined with a load of 200 g for 10 s. The data were analyzed with the Anova test.
Results: polishing after 24 h obtained surfaces with higher surface hardness compared to immediate polishing, being statistically significant (P= 0,0001). The Filtek Z350 nanohybrid resin presented higher surface hardness than the Tetric N ceram resins and Brillian resin for immediate polishing and polishing after 24 hours, being statistically significant in both cases.
Conclusion: the polishing after 24 hours of polymerization presented values with higher surface hardness for the three nanohybrid resins studied.
Downloads
References
1. Revollar J, López A, et al. Evaluación de la microdureza superficial de discos de resina para reconstrucción de muñones. Estudio in vitro. Rev Cient Odontol[Internet]. 2018[citado 03/04/2025]; 6(1): 29-38. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-998742
2. Yazici A, Tuncer D, Onen A, Kilinc E. Effects of delayed fi nishing/polishing on surface roughness, hardness and gloss of tooth-coloured restorative materials Eur J Dent. [Internet]. 2010[cited 03/04/2025]; 4(1):50-6. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20046480/
3. García-Contreras R, Scougall-Vilchis R, Acosta-Torres L, Arenas-Arrocena C, García-Garduño R, de la Fuente-Hernández J. Vickers microhardness comparison of 4 composite resins with different types of filler. J Oral Res [Internet]. 2015 [cited 03/04/2025]; 4(5): 313-20. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2015.061
4. Suarez R, Lozano F. Comparación de la dureza superficial de resinas de nanotecnología, según el momento de pulido: in vitro. Rev Estomatol Herediana[Internet]. 2014[cited 03/04/2025]; 24(1):11-16. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4215/421539380003.pdf
5. Salas Y, Lozano F. estudio in vitro de la microdureza superficial en resinas compuestas de metacrilato y silorano. KIRU[Internet]. 2014[cited 03/04/2025]; 11(1): 69-73. Disponible en: https://repositorio.usmp.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12727/1941/kiru_11%281%292014_salas_lozano?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
6. Rodas Cando DF, Morales Bravo BR. Estudio Comparativo de las propiedades mecánicas de diferentes tipos de resina compuesta y sus usos de acuerdo a su composición. Revisión de literatura. Anatomía Digital[Internet]. 2023[citado 03/04/2025]; 6(3.2): 103-122. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.33262/anatomiadigital.v6i3.2.2679
7. Hervás García A, Martínez Lozano MA, Cabanes Vila J. Resinas Compuestas. Revisión de los materiales e indicaciones clínicas. Med. Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal[Internet]. 2006[citado 03/04/2025]; 11(2): 15-20. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1698-69462006000200023
8. Pires HC, Carvalho OB, et al. Avaliacao da dureza Vickers de 29 resinas compostas. Rev Odontol Aracatuba[Internet]. 2007[cited 03/04/2025]; 28(3): 16-23. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-856810
9. Gómez Basurto S, Noriega Barba M, et al. Evaluación in vitro de la microdureza superficial de diferentes resinas comerciales, frente a la acción de una bebida gaseosa carbonatada. Rev Odontol Mex[Internet]. 2010[cited 03/04/2025];14(1): 8-14. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-199X2010000100008
10. Suárez López JS. microdureza superficial de tres resinas compuestas nanohíbridas según el tiempo de espera para el pulido. Facultd de Odontología. Lima- Perú[Internet]; 2021[citado 03/04/2025]. Disponible en: https://repositorio.usmp.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12727/7430/su%C3%A1rez_ljs.pdf?sequence=1
11. Vaca Altamirano G, Mena Silva P, Armijos Briones, M. La resina Bulk Fill como material innovador. Revisión bibliográfica. Rev. Dilemas contemporáneos: educación, política y valores[Internet]. 2021[citado 03/04/2025]; 8(SPE3): 00064. Disponible en: .https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v8i.2746
12. Acurio-Benavente P, Falcón-Cabrera G, Casas-Apayco L, Montoya Caferatta P. Comparación de la resistencia compresiva de resinas convencionales vs resinas tipo Bulk fill. Odontología Vital [Internet]. 2017 Dec [citado 03/04/2025]; (27): 69-77. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1659-07752017000200069&lng=en
13. Nuéz Linares M. Análisis comparativo de microdureza superficial de las resinas nanohíbridas y Bulk Fill mediante dos sistemas de pulido. Estudio In Vitro. Universidad Norbert Wiener. Lima, Perú[Internet]; 2021[citado 03/04/2025]. Disponible en: https://repositorio.uwiener.edu.pe/server/api/core/bitstreams/7976d6ca-0bab-474a-ae77-5b82eb39c320/content
14. Pala K. Tekce N, et al. Evaluation of the Surface hardness, roughness, gloss and color of composites after different finishing/polishing treatments and thermocycling using a multitechnique approach. Dent Mater J[Internet]. 2016[cited 03/04/2025]; 35(2): 278-289. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-260
15. Nasoohi N, Hoorizad M, Tabatabaei SF. Effects of Wet and dry finishing and polishing on Surface Roughness and Microhardness od composite resins. J Dent[Internet]. 2017[cited 03/04/2025]; 14(2): 69-75. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5662511/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/