Trends in the management process for training in English in the Medicine major, at Pinar del Río School of Medical Sciences
Keywords:
Teaching/trends, Medical education.Abstract
Introduction: the management process for training in English is a vital tool for achieving overall objectives in professional and personal training of the basic general practitioner, and that language constitutes a tool for studying and working.Objective: to characterize the current state of the management process for training English in the Medicine major at Pinar del Rio University of Medical Sciences.
Methods: a study based on the dialectical materialist method was developed. Historical and logical and systemic-structural as part of a system of theoretical methods were used. Empirical level methods used are: surveys, interviews, observation and descriptive statistics.
Results: trends in management education in international and national contexts are systematized. There is no adequate conceptualization of the process in the group this year, for planning, organization, regulation and control; lack of systematic was proved in the methodological work with the disciplines of the group of this year; the mentioned disciplinary process lacks integrity and does not project a coherent English syllabus strategy, specialized for each course of the academic year.
Conclusions: at Pinar del Rio University of Medical Sciences, the management process for training in English is not systemic and does not integrate the contents, which limits the actions for the use of the English language as a tool for studying and working after a specialized and comprehensive training of the medical student from the group of this year and in the center of the training process.
Downloads
References
1. Casassus JA. Problemas de la gestión educativa en América Latina (la tensión entre los paradigmas de tipo A y el tipo B). UNESCO. 2000; Disponible en: http://ceadug.ugto.mx/iglu/Mod%20III/lecturas/Problemas_gestion_educativa1.pdf [Consultado 10 de diciembre del 2013]
2. Antúnez S. Claves para la organización de centros escolares. Barcelona: ICE: Universidad de Barcelona y Editorial Horsori; 1998.
3. Sánchez HJJ. La gestión participativa en la enseñanza, 2a ed., Madrid: Narcea; 1979.
4. Romero Carbonell M, Gisbert Cervera M, Carrera Farrán J, et al (2009). Centro Virtual de Recursos de Tecnología Educativa: una herramienta para la formación inicial de maestros en TIC. Revista Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento[internet]. Julio 2009[citado enero 2014]; 6(2). Disponible en: http://rusc.uoc.edu/index.php/rusc/article/view/v6n2-romero_etal
5. Lavin S, Martínez F, Noriega CX. La Calidad de la educación primaria. Un estudio de caso. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica; 1997.
6. Bidegain L. La gestión educativa. Santo Domingo, República Dominicana: Educando: Portal de la Educación Dominicana; 2009.
7. Ruiz JM. Dirección de los procesos educativos. Universidad de Pinar del Río, 1998.
8. Ezpeleta J. El consejo técnico: eficacia pedagógica y estructura de poder en la escuela primaria mexicana. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos. 1990; 10(4): 13-33.
9. Correa de Urrea A, Álvarez A, Correa S. La gestión Educativa un nuevo paradigma. Medellín: Colombia; Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigó; 2010. Disponible en: http://virtual.funlam.edu.co/repositorio/sites/default/files/6lagestioneducativaunnuevoparadigma.pdf [Consultado 10 de diciembre del 2013].
10. Dewey J. Cómo pensamos. Barcelona: Paidós; 1933.
11. Schön D. La formación de profesionales reflexivos. Barcelona: Centro de Publicaciones del Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia y Paidós; 1992.
12. Willover D. Educational administration: Inquiry, values, practice. Pennsylvania: Lancaster; 1994.
13. Sergiovianni T. Educational governance and administration. 3a. ed. Boston, Allyn and Bacon; 1992.
14. Foster W. Paradigms and promises. Buffalo, Nueva York: Prometheus Books; 1986.
15. Culberston J. A century's quest for knowledge base N. J. Boyaned. New York: Longman; 1988.
16. Wolcott J. The Man in the Principal's Office: An Ethnography. Updated edition. Walnut Creek,CA: Alta Mira Press. 1973.
17. Casassus J. Marcos conceptuales para el análisis de los cambios en la gestión de los sistemas educativos en La Gestión: en busca del sujeto. Santiago de Chile: UNESCO Orealc; 1999.
18. Ezpeleta J, Furlán A. La gestión pedagógica. Polémicas y casos. En: Ezpeleta y Furlan (eds.) La gestión pedagógica de la escuela. México: UNESCO-Orealc; 2000.
19. Sander B. Nuevas Tendencias en la Gestión Educativa: Democracia y Calidad. Colombia: Colombia Aprende; 2002. Disponible en: http://redes.colombiaaprende.edu.co/foro_gestion/sites/default/files/NUEVAS%20TENDENCIAS%20EN%20LA%20GESTI%C3%93N%20EDUCATIVA.pdf [Consultado 10 de diciembre 2013]
20. Seddon T. Markets and the Enblish: Rethinking educational restructuring as institutional design. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 1997; 18(2): 165-85.
21. Batista T. Una propuesta del proceso de gestión pedagógica del colectivo de año. Metodología de instrumentación en la carrera de Agronomía en el Centro Universitario Isla de la Juventud [Tesis doctoral]: Uiversidad de Pinar del Río; 2005.
22. Ruiz H. Entrevista Asesora. La Habana: Dirección de formación del profesional; Ministerio de Educación Superior; 2003.
23. Horrutinier Silva P. La Universidad cubana: El Modelo de formación. Revista Pedagogía Universitaria; 2007; 12(4): 2007.
24. Corona MD. El perfeccionamiento de la enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras a estudiantes no filólogos en la educación superior cubana [Tesis Doctoral]. Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba; 1988.
25. Arroyo M. La superación profesional de los profesores universitarios en la disciplina idioma Inglés: Su perfeccionamiento y aplicación en la Universidad de Pinar del Río [Tesis Doctoral]. Pinar del Río, Cuba: Universidad de Pinar del Río; 2000.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/
