Evaluation of elective oncologic colorectal surgery without mechanical colon preparation
Keywords:
Colorectal surgery, Postoperative, Anastomotic dehiscence, OncologyAbstract
Introduction: mechanical preparation of the colon in elective oncological colorectal surgery is increasingly questionable; its routine practice does not demonstrate important benefits for the patient.
Objective: to evaluate elective oncological colorectal surgery without mechanical preparation, in the General Surgery service, Provincial Clinical Surgical Teaching Hospital “Dr. Blonde Crow Lion.”
Methods: an observational, analytical, prospective and longitudinal research was carried out. The study covered the period from January 2019 to December 2021, 100% of patients who underwent elective oncological colorectal surgery without mechanical preparation were studied (N-54). For the statistical analysis of said information and given its characteristics, the final results were processed and presented in distribution and frequency tables; the chi square was used as the unit of measurement.
Results: the most prevalent complication in the postoperative period of elective oncological colorectal surgery without mechanical preparation was surgical site infection (SSI). The elderly was the age group where postoperative complications occurred the most, with the female sex being the most representative. No relationship was found between the surgical treatments implemented with the appearance of anastomotic dehiscence, there is a two-fold risk of readmission due to SSI as a postoperative complication and the risk of death due to an anastomotic dehiscence is three times greater than due to the appearance of another postoperative complication.
Conclusions: elective oncological colorectal surgery is becoming more frequent every day in our service, with postoperative complications being a problem in the hands of any surgeon, ruining readmissions and mortality, undoubtedly affecting hospital costs in our country.
Downloads
References
Romero Prada ME, Albanes Beltran JP, Cardoso N LM, Bermeo Y. Cambios en la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud de pacientes sometidos a preparación intestinal. Value in Health. [Internet] 2017 [citado 12 Oct 2023]; 20(9): [aprox. 9 p.]. Disponible en: https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015 (17)32874-7/fulltext
D Shida et al. “Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer,” BMC Surg., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 18, Dec. 2017.
Miyamoto Y, Hiyoshi Y, Tokunaga R, Akiyama T, Daitoku N, Sakamoto Y, et al. Postoperative complications are associated with poor survival outcome after curative resection for colorectal cancer: A propensity-score analysis. J Surg Oncol. [Internet] 2020 [citado 12 Oct 2023]; 122:344–9. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25961
Carrillo Esper R. Protocolo ERAS (Enhance Recovery After Surgery). Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología. [Internet] 2016 [citado 12 Oct 2023]; 39(1):153-5. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.medigraphic.com/rma
González de la Fuente I, Gutiérrez Benito L. Manejo multidisciplinar y tratamiento del cáncer de colon y recto. Programa de rehabilitación multimodal “FAST-TRAC” [Tesis para optar el grado en medicina]. España: Universidad de Valladolid. [Internet] 2016 [citado 12 Oct 2023]. Disponible en: http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/18760
Chen M, Song X, Chen LZ, Lin ZD, Zhang XL. Comparing mechanica bowel preparation with both oral and systemic antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation and systemic antibiotics alone for the prevention of surgical site infection after elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Dis Colon Rectum. [Internet] 2016[citado 12 Oct 2023]; 59 (1): 70-78. Disponible en: doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000524. PMID: 26651115.
Ramírez Rodríguez JM, Roig Vila JV. Programas de rehabilitación multimodal: fast-track la recuperación intensificada. Monografías de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos. [Internet] 2015 [citado 12 Oct 2023]; 3:11. Disponible en: https://www.aecirujanos.es/files/documentacion/documentos/03-rehabilitacion-multimodal.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiDy5jx_KnvAhwr2FkKHdyOC4YQFjAAegQIBBaB&usg=AOvVaw1_d9meRefgch6LaiJX2p_R
Machado Lilian, Turrini Ruth N, Siqueira Ana L. Reingresopor infección del sitio quirurgico: una revisión integradora. Rev.Child. infectol. [Internet] 2013 [citado 12 Oct 2023]; 30 (1): 10-16. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.php?script sci asttextpid so716-10182013000100002 lng es.
Lawler J, Choynowski M, Bailey K, Bucholc M, Johnston A, Sugrue M. Meta‐analysis of the impact of postoperative infective complications on oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. BJS Open. [Internet] 2020[citado 12 Oct 2023]; 4:737-47. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50302
Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S, Kubilay NZ, Zayed B, Gomes SM, et al. Development Group. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. [Internet] 2016 [citado 12 Oct 2023; 16(12):e276-e87. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27816413/
Pera M, Bollo J, Martín A, Fraccalvieri D, Parés D. Societat Catalana de Cirugía. Recomanacions per a la prevenció de la infecció postoperatòria en la cirugía colo-rectal electiva. Vigilancia de les infeccionsnosocomialsalshospitals de Catalunya. [Internet] 2016 [citado 12 Oct 2023]. Disponible en: https://core.ac.uk/dowload/pdf/78543443.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwj85Irrn6_vAhVmkeAKHZ3DBpoQFjAAegQICRAB&usg=AOvVaw0qaxBg1D0OtiGxt1obCXq
Miranda Pedroso Rafael. Mortality from secondary peritonitis in anintensive care unit. Rev.Med.Electron. [Internet] 2020 [citado 12 Oct 2023]; 42 (1): 1622-1631. Disponible en: http//scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?scriptsciarttextpids1684-18242020000101622lnges.
Sánchez-Guillén L, Frasson M, Pellino G, Fornés-Ferrer V, Ramos JL, Flor-Lorente B, et al. Nomograms for morbidity and mortality after oncologic colon resection in the enhanced recovery era: results from a multicentric prospective national study. Int J Colorectal Dis. [Internet] 2020 [citado 12 Oct 2023]; 35:2227-38. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03692-x
Larin RA. Preparación de colon vrs no preparación en cirugía colorectal electiva: ISSS octubre 2015 - octubre 2016 [Tesis]. San Salvador: s/n. [Internet] 2017 [citado 12 Oct 2023]. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1179352
Louis M, Johnston SA, Churilov L, Ma R, Marhoon N, Burgess A, et al. The hospital costs of complications following colonic resection surgery: A retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg. [Internet] 2020 [citado 12 Oct 2023]; 54:37-42. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.03.013
Slim K, Vicaut E, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of colorectal surgery with or without mechanical bowel preparation. Br J Surg. [Internet] 2004 [citado 12 Oct 2023]; 91:1125-30. Disponible en: doi: 10.1002/bjs.4651. PMID: 15449262.
Wille-Jorgensen P, Guenaga KF, Matos D, Castro A. Pre-operative mechanical bowel cleansing or not? An updated meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. [Internet] 2005 [citado 12 Oct 2023]; 7:304-10. Disponible en: doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00804.x. PMID: 15932549.
Wille-Jorgensen P, Guenaga KF, Castro A, Matos D. Preoperative bowel cleansing in elective colorectal surgery. Update of a metaanalysis. Dis Colon Rectum. [Internet] 2006 [citado 12 Oct 2023]; 49:745. Disponible en: doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-7274-x. PMID: 12907890.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/