Causal analysis of the degree of effectiveness of pulpotomies according to current criteria and standards
Keywords:
Root canal therapy, Endodontics.Abstract
Introduction: the assessment of the effectiveness of pulpotomies contitutes a feedback means to judge and improve their quality, their causes and mistakes in their main stages are analyzed.Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness and causes associated with fairly failed and risks treatments at Antonio Briones Montoto University Dental Clinic, from September 2011 to September 2012.
Material and method: a retrospective study was carried out, the probability sampling comprised 200 treatments; clinical tests and radiographies were made to compare with the existing in the clinical records. Absolute and relative frequencies were used for summary measures for qualitative variable expressed in percentages. In view of achieveing the possible statistical association between two variables chi-squared test was used. Results: cured teeth predominated with 81% of the cases, followed by failed, sick (10.5%). In the failed cases and with functional retention, the main defficiency was apical filtration with 48%, within the latter imcomplete preparation and fillings of the principal radicular passage, 91.6%, particularly in short fillings, 53.9%. Incorrect fillings, 71.4%, predomaninated in the failed cases. 55.9% of sick periapex presented granulomas.
Conclusions: achieved effectiveness rate was very close to the high-quality standards internationally accepted, while poor quality in passage fillings constituted a predominating cause in treatments considered failed.
Downloads
References
1. López López J, Jané Salas E, Estrugo Devesa A, Castellanos Cosano L, Martín González J, Velasco Ortega E, et al. Frecuency and distribution of root-filled teeth and apical periodontitis in an adult population of Barcelona, Spain J. Int Dent J.[Internet] 2012 Feb [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 62(1): [Aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22251036
2. Pitt Ford TR. Endodoncia en la Práctica Clínica. 4ta Ed. Mexico DF: Mc Graw-Hill Interamericana; 1999.
3. Friedman S. The success of endodontic pherapy-healing and funcionality. Endod Pract. [Internet] 2004 Dec [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 32(6): [Aprox. 10p.]. Disponible en: http://www.endoexperience.com/documents/SuccessHealingFriedman.pdf
4. Nair P N, Jögren U, Sundquist G. Colesterol crystals as an etiological factor in no resolving chronic inflammation: an experimental study in guinea pigs. Eur-J-Sci . [Internet] 1998 Apr [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 106 (2 Pt 1): [Aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9584911
5. Lee AH, , Wong MC. Long-term outcome of primary non-surgical root canal treatment. Clin Oral Investig. [Internet] 2012 [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 16(6): [Aprox. 10p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22205268
6. Liang YH, Li G, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. The association between complete absence of post-treatment periapical lesion and quality of root canal filling. Clin Oral Investig. [Internet] 2012 [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 16(6): [Aprox. 7p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22228024
7. Cohen S, Burns RC. Endodoncia. Vías de la Pulpa. 8va Ed. España: Editorial Elsevier; 2004.
8. Ricucci D, Russo J, Rutberg M, Burleson JA, Spångberg LS. A prospective cohort study of endodontic treatments of 1,369 root canals: results after 5 years. Oral Surg- Oral Med- Oral Endod. [Internet] 2011 Dec [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 112(6): [Aprox. 17p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099859
9. Bernstein SD, Horowitz AJ, Man M, Wu H, Foran D, Vena DA, et al. Outcomes of endodontic therapy in general practice: a study by the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning Network. J Am Dent Assoc. [Internet] 2012 May [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 143(5): [Aprox. 9p.]. Disponible en: http://jada.ada.org/content/143/5/478.abstract
10. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapicalhealth.Int Endod J. [Internet] 2011 Jul [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 44(7): [Aprox. 23p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21366626
11. Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG. Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics. Int J Dent. [Internet] 2009 [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 2009. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2850139/
12. Silva LA, Novaes AB, de Oliveira RR, Nelson Filho P, Santamaria M, Silva RA. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for the treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histopathological evaluation. Endod. [Internet] 2012 Mar [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 38(3): [Aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://www.jendodon.com/article/S0099-2399%2811%2901456-7/abstract
13. Vera J, Siqueira JF Jr, Ricucci D, Loghin S, Fernández N, Flores B, Et al. One- versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study. J Endod. [Internet] 2012 Aug [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 38(8): [Aprox. 12p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22794203
14. Paredes Vieyra J, Enriquez FJ. Success Rate of Single- versus Two-visit Root Canal Treatment of Teeth with Apical Periodontitis: A? Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endod. [Internet] 2012 Sep [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 38(9): [Aprox. 5p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22892729
15. Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS, Loushine BA, Weller RN, Loushine J. Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. [Internet] 2011 Jul [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 37(7): [Aprox. 7p.]. Disponible en: http://www.endoexperience.com/documents/Coronlaseal.pdf
16. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Foschi F, Mannocci F. The detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 2: a 1-year post-treatment follow-up. Int Endod J. [Internet] 2012 Aug [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 45(8): [Aprox. 12p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22775142
17. Peters LB, Lindeboom JA, Elst ME, Wesselink PR. Prevalence of apical periodontitis relative to endodontic treatment in an adult Dutch population: a repeated cross-sectional study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. [Internet] 2011 Apr [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 111(4): [Aprox. 5p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21292515
18. Kamberi B, Hoxha V, Stavileci M, Dragusha E, Kuçi A, Kqiku L. Prevalence of apical periodontitis and endodontic treatment in a Kosovar adult population. BMC Oral Health. [Internet] 2011 [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 11. Disponible en: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/11/32
19. Fernandes M, de Ataide I. Nonsurgical management of periapical lesions. J Conserv Dent. [Internet] 2010 Oct [Citado 20de mayo de 2013]; 13(4): [Aprox. 5p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3010029/

Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/