Behavior of Recurrent Postsurgical Intracranial Meningiomas
Keywords:
Meningioma, Histology, General surgery.Abstract
Introduction: histological stage and extent of initial surgical resection has been considered decisive prognostic factors in meningiomas.Objective: to determine the behavior of recurrent intracranial meningiomas operated at Abel Santamaría Cuadrado Hospital during the period 2010-2013.
Method: a quasi-experimental, descriptive and applied longitudinal study was carried out. The study group consisted of 46 patients operated at the Neurosurgery Service, while the sample comprised 8 relapsing patients who met the inclusion criteria. Specific data is collected from the individuals´ medical records. A database was compiled to facilitate information processing, with the help of the professional software SPSS 15.0. To carry out the analysis we used comparison test of proportions for independent samples.
Results: the degree of recurrence is higher in the skull base (50%) and in the parasagittal region (33.3%). More than 50% of the operated cases belong to stage I, while those who relapsed were in stages II and III (62.5%). The shortest time for recurrence was 14 and 6 months in patients with high-grade malignancy and subtotal removal. The site of recurrence was more related to the temporal area of the skull base and the greater wing of the sphenoid.
Conclusions: the recurrence of intracranial meningiomas was associated with the histological stage, tumor resection, the surgical technique used and the approach, regardless of the extent of surgical resection.
Downloads
References
1. González Orlandi Y, Elizondo Barrier L, Junco Martín R, Rojas Manresa J, Duboy Limonta V, et al. Meningioma maligno. Rev Cubana Cir. [revista en la Internet]. 2011 Mar [citado 2013 Abr 01]; 50(1): 108-114. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932011000100010&lng
2. Sughrue ME, Kane Ari J, Shangari G, Rutkowski MJ, McDermott MW, et al. The relevance of Simpson Grade I and II resection in modern neurosurgical treatment of World Health Organization Grade I meningiomas. Journal of Neurosurgery. [Internet] 2010 [citado 10 febrero 2013]; 113(5): 1029-1035. Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2010.3.JNS091971
3. Kawai K, Nakatomi H., Saito N. Significance of Simpson grading system in modern meningioma surgery: integration of the grade with MIB-1 labeling index as a key to predict the recurrence of WHO Grade I meningiomas. Journal of Neurosurgery. [Internet] 2012 [citado 13 Marzo 2013] 117(1): 121-8. Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2012.3.JNS111945
4.Munsell FM, Mahajan A, DeMonte F, Woo SY. A comparison of World Health Organization tumor grades at recurrence in patients with non-skull base and skull base meningiomas. Journal of Neurosurgery. [Internet] 2010 [citado 13 Mazo 2013] 112(5): 925-33 Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2009.9.JNS09617
5. Mirimanoff RO, Dosoretz DE, Linggood RM, Ojemann RG, Martuza RL. Meningioma: analysis of recurrence and progression following neurosurgical resection. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 1985; 62(1):18-24.
6. Alvernia JE, Dang ND, Sindou MP. Convexity meningiomas: study of recurrence factors with special emphasis on the cleavage plane in a series of 100 consecutive patients. Journal of Neurosurgery. [Internet] 2011[citado 12 enero 2013] 115(3): 491-8. Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2011.4.JNS101922
7. Heros RC . Simpson grade and treatment. Journal of Neurosurgery [internet] 2010 / [citado 23 febrero 2013] 113(5): 1026-1027. Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2010.2.JNS10280
8. Hou L, Harsh GR. Management of recurrent gliomas and meningiomas. [Internet] 2012[citado 20 febrero 2013] 347-71. Disponible en: http://www.expertconsultbook.com/expertconsult/ob/book.do?method=display&type=bookPage&decorator=none&eid=4 -u1.0-B978-0-443-06967-3..00019-3—s0010&isbn=978-0-443-06967-3
9. Ohba S, Kobayashi M, Horiguchi T, Onozuka S, Yoshida K et al. Long-term surgical outcome and biological prognostic factors in patients with skull base meningiomas. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. [Internet] 2011; 114(5) [citado 28 febrero 2013]. Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2010.11.JNS10701
10. Sughrue M.E, Rutkowski MJ, Shangari GB., Parsa AT, Berger MS, McDermott MW. Results with judicious modern neurosurgical management of parasagittal and falcine meningiomas. Journal of Neurosurgery.[internet] 2011[citado 23 febrero ]; 114( 3): 731-737. Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2010.9.JNS10646
11. Attia M, Umansk F, Paldor I, Dotan S, Shoshan Y, Spektor S. Giant anterior clinoidal meningiomas: surgical technique and outcomes. Journal of Neurosurgery [internet] 2012 [citado 23 febrero 2013]; 117(4): 654-665. Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2012.7.JNS111675
12. Liu JK. Microsurgical resection of giant intraventricular meningioma. Neurosurgical Focus: Special Supplements. 2013;34(1 Suppl): 1-1.
13. Hasegawa T, Kida Y, Yoshimoto M, Lizuka H, Ishii D, Yoshida K . Gamma Knife surgery for convexity, parasagittal, and falcine meningiomas.journal of neurosurgery. [Internet] 2011[citado 23 febrero 2013]; 114(5): 1392-1398. Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2010.11.JNS10112
14. Curey S, Derrey S, Hannequin P, Hannequin D, Fréger P, Muraine M. Et al. Validation of the superior interhemispheric approach for tuberculum sellae meningioma. journal of neurosurgery. 2012; 117(6): 1013-21.
15. Sanai N, McDermott MW. A modified far-lateral approach for large or giant meningiomas of the posterior fossa.journal of neurosurgery.[internet]2010[citado 23 febrero 2013]112(5) 907-12. Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2009.6.JNS09120
16. Chokyu I, Got T, Ishibashi K, Nagata T, Ohata K. Bilateral subfrontal approach for tuberculum sellae meningiomas in long-term postoperative visual outcome. Journal of neurosurgery. [Internet] 2011[citado 23 febrero 2013]115(4) 802-10. Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2011.5.JNS101812
17. Wong JM, Jaykar R, Panchmatia JR, Chir B, Ziewacz JE, Bader AM.et al. Patterns in neurosurgical adverse events: intracranial neoplasm surgery.journal of neurosurgery. [Internet] 2012[citado 23 febrero 2013]; 33(5): E16. Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.7.FOCUS12183
18. Lah TT , Nanni I, Trinkaus M, Metellus P, Dussert C,et al. Toward understanding recurrent meningioma: the potential role of lysosomal cysteine proteases and their inhibitors. Journal of Neurosurgery. [Internet] 2010 [citado 13 Mazo 2013]; 112(5): 940-50. Disponible en; http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2009.7.JNS081729
19. Couldwell WT, Cole CD, Al-Mefty O. Patterns of skull base meningioma progression after failed radiosurgery. Collections. 2011; 15(4): 30-35.
20. McGovern SL, Aldape KD, Munsell MF, Mahajan A, DeMonte F, Woo SY et al. A comparison of World Health Organization tumor grades at recurrence in patients with non-skull base and skull base meningiomas.Journal of Neurosurgery.May[internet] 2010 [citado 12 enero 2013]; 112(5): 925-33. Disponible en: http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2009.9.JNS09617

Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/