Trends, collaboration and impact of scientific production on oral cancer in the Web of Science
Keywords:
MOUTH NEOPLASMS, BIBLIOMETRICS, BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS, COLLABORATION INDICATOR, SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION INDICATORS, IMPACT FACTOR, MOUTH DISEASES.Abstract
Introduction: oncological diseases, including oral cancer, are the object of study of various institutions; for this reason it is necessary to analyze the behavior of this published science.
Objective: to analyze the scientific production on oral cancer in the Web of Science in the period 2000 to 2020.
Methods: a bibliometric study of the articles on oral cancer published in the Core Collections of Web of Science was conducted. The co-occurrence matrices for the analysis of the networks were pre-processed in Bibexel, and VOSviewer v1.6.15 was used its analysis. Visibility, impact and cooperation indicators were analyzed.
Results: the documents analyzed (10349), where 76,50 % were original articles. The citations received were 198 302, for an average of 19, 9 citations per article. The variation rate in terms of the number of articles was 82,91 %. Publications written in English language reached 98,96 %. The United States was the most productive country, with 23,92 %. The documents were published in 1416 resources and signed by 5160 institutions; at least 138 collaborated on one article.
Conclusions: there is an increasing interest in research on oral cancer, concentrated in a small number of countries which exhibit genuine leadership capabilities in this field. Progress was evidenced in terms of international collaboration. The analysis of the co-occurrence of terms reflects the interest of the international scientific community in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of this disease at a global level.
Downloads
References
1. Araya C. Diagnóstico precoz y prevención en cáncer de cavidad oral. REV. MED. CLIN. CONDES [Internet]. 2018 [citado 10/02/2020]; 29(4):4111-418. Disponible en: http://www.enfermeriaaps.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Diagn%C3%B3stico-precoz-y-prevenci%C3%B3n-en-c%C3%A1ncer-de-cavidad-oral.pdf
2. Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncology [Internet]. 2009 [citado 02/02/2021]; 45(4): 309-16. Disponible en: http://www.exodontia.info/files/Oral_Oncology_2009._Review._Global_epidemiology_of_oral_and_oro-pharyngeal_cancer.pdf
3. Hashim D, Sartori S, Brennan P, Curado MP, Wünsch-Filho V, Divaris K, et al. The role of oral hygiene in head and neck cancer: results from International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology (INHANCE) consortium. Annals Oncology [Internet]. 2016 [citado 02/02/2021]; 27(8):1619-25. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923753419347520?via%3Dihub
4. Foy J-P, Bertolus C, Goudot P, Deneuve S, Blanc E, Lasset C, et al. Bibliometric analysis of a century of research on oral erythroplakia and leukoplakia. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine [Internet]. 2018 [citado 02/02/2021]; Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jop.12683
5. Moura LKB, Mobin M, Matos FTC, Monte TL, Lago EC, Falcão CAM, et al. Bibliometric Analysis on the Risks of Oral Cancer for People Living with HIV/AIDS. Iranian Journal of Public Health [Internet]. 2017 [citado 02/02/2021]; 46(11):1583-5. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696700/
6. Konur O. Chapter 29 - Scientometric overview regarding oral cancer nanomedicine. En: Andronescu E, Grumezescu AM, editores. Nanostructures for Oral Medicine [Internet]. Elsevier; 2017 [citado 2 de marzo de 2018]. p. 939-62. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323477208000304
7. Gonzalez-Argote J. Fuentes primarias Producción Científica sobre Cáncer Bucal. Zenodo [Internet]. 2018 [citado 02/02/2021]. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1203353
8. Gonzalez-Argote J. Procedimientos para el cálculo de indicadores bibliométricos a partir de metadatos. Zenodo [Internet]. 2018 [citado 02/02/2021]. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1196592
9. Clarivate Analytics. Journal Citation Reports [Internet]. 2017 [citado 02/02/2021]. Disponible en: https://clarivate.com/products/journal-citation-reports/
10. Gonzalez-Argote J. Coeficiente de correlación de Spearman. Zenodo [Internet]. 2018 [citado 02/02/2021]. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1203344
11. Franco-Lopez A, Sanz-Valero J, Culebras JM. Publicar en castellano, o en cualquier otro idioma que no sea inglés, negativo para el factor de impacto y citaciones. Journal of Negative and No Positive Results [Internet]. 2016 [citado 02/02/2021]; 1(2):65-70. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5600084
12. Cheng-Cheng W, Yi-Zu W, Hao-Yu H, Xue-Qiang W. Bibliometric Analysis of Research on the Comorbidity of Cancer and Pain. Journal of Pain Research [Internet]. 2021 [citado 10/02/2020] 14:213-228. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc7851761/
13. Tota JE, Anderson WF, Coffey C, Califano J, Cozen W, Ferris RL, et al. Rising incidence of oral tongue cancer among white men and women in the United States, 1973–2012. Oral Oncology [Internet]. 2017 [citado 02/02/2021]; 67:146-52. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1368837517300519
14. Abbasi A, Hossain L, Uddin S, Rasmussen KJR. Evolutionary dynamics of scientific collaboration networks: multi-levels and cross-time analysis. Scientometrics [Internet]. 2011 [citado 02/02/2021]; 89(2):687. Disponible en: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1107/1107.5870.pdf
15. Valle R, Rivera-Encinas MT, Stucchi-Portocarrero S. Producción, impacto y colaboración en investigaciones peruanas en psiquiatría y salud mental. Acta méd Peru [Internet]. 2020 [citado 02/02/2021]; 37(3):285-93. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1728-59172020000300285
16. Cañedo Andalia R, Nodarse Rodríguez M, Cruz Font J, Germán Hechavarría I, Celorrio Zaragoza I, Pupo G, et al. Papel de la colaboración científica en el impacto de la investigación en salud de Cuba en el contexto de América Latina. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud [Internet]. 2016 [citado 02/02/2021];27(1):56-74. Disponible en: http://www.acimed.sld.cu/index.php/acimed/article/view/831
17. Ramírez Ruiz L. Campo científico y redes de coautoría en la psiquiatría. La producción científica psiquiátrica mexicana sobre el trastorno de la personalidad. Redes Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales [Internet]. 2010 [citado 02/02/2021]; 19(2):20-39. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/931/93117224002.pdf
18. Chen C. Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA [Internet]. 2004 [citado 02/02/2021]; 101(Suppl 1):5303-10. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC387312/
19. Gálves C. El campo de investigación del Análisis de Redes Sociales en el área de las Ciencias de la Documentación: un análisis de co-citación y co-palabras. Rev. gen. inf. doc [Internet]. 2018 [citado 02/02/2021]; 28(2):455-475. Disponible en: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RGID/article/view/62834
20. Wang M, Xiao C, Ni P, Yu JJ, Wang XW, Sun H. Correlation of Betel Quid with Oral Cancer from 1998 to 2017: A Study Based on Bibliometric Analysis. Chinese Medical Jounal [Internet]. 2018 [citado 02/02/2021]; 131(16): 1975-82. Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/cmj/Fulltext/2018/08200/Correlation_of_Betel_Quid_with_Oral_Cancer_from.14.aspx
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/
