A methodology to perform pediatric evaluation in Emergency Rooms
Abstract
Background: To distinguish between those needing urgent medical care and those who do not, is turning into a serious problem for the medical personnel working in the emergency services; specifically in pediatric ages. Objective: To present and promote a methodology of physical evaluation which allows identifying anatomical and functional abnormalities in children, estimating the severity and determining how urgent medical intervention is needed in the emergency departments of primary health care. Development: Medical personnel working in the emergency departments require theoretical bases in order to enhance the process of decision-making regarding urgent affections in childhood, diminishing the costs of the assistance and overcrowding the in emergency services of the secondary health care. Conclusion: It is appropriate to encourage a continuing training of the medical personnel in order to develop specific aptitudes to carry out a proper assessment of the pediatric emergencies to achieve the excellence in medical services.Downloads
References
1. Puga Teodoro F. Enseñanza de la Pediatría en escuelas de Medicina de América Latina. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Serie HCT/AIEPI 58.E; 2002.
2. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Dirección Nacional de Registros Médicos y Estadísticas de Salud: Anuario Estadístico de Salud ISSN: 1561-4425 Cuba; 2007.
3. Bhende M, Thompson A. Evaluation o fan end-tidal CO2 detector during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Pediatrics. 2004; 95:395-399.
4. Durch JS, Lohr KN. Institute of Medicine Report: Emergency medical Sevices for Children. Washington, DC: Nacional Academy Press; 1993.
5. Mintegui Raso S, Benito Fernández J, García González S, Corrales Fernández A, Bartolomé Albistegui MJ, Trebolazabala Quirante N. Demanda y asistencia de un servicio de urgencias hospitalario. Barcelona. An Pediatr. 2004;61:156-61.
6. Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine. Overcrowdins Crisis in Our Nation's Emergency Departments: Is Our Safety Net Unraveling? Pediatrics. 2004; 114:878-88.
7. Brousseau DC, Mistry RD, Alessandrini EA. Methods of Categorizing Emergency Department Visit Urgency. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006; 22:635-9
8. Grupo de Trabajo de Codificación Diagnóstica de la Sociedad de Urgencias de Pediatría de la Asociación Española de Pediatría. Codificación diagnóstica en urgencias de pediatría. An Esp Pediatr. 2000; 53:261-72.
9. Grupo de Trabajo de Indicadores de Calidad de la Sociedad Española de Urgencias de Pediatría. Servicios de urgencias: indicadores de calidad de la atención sanitaria. Barcelona. An Pediatr. 2004;60:569-80.
10. Mintegui S. Grupo de Trabajo de Intoxicaciones de la Sociedad Española de Urgencias Pediátricas. Manual de Intoxiciaciones en pediatría. España: Ediciones Ergon; 2004.
11. Grup de Treball d'Urgències Pedi? triques de la Societat Catalana de Pediatria. Urgències pedi? triques: actualització sobre l'activitat asistencial i els recursos al nostre medi. Pediatria Catalana. 2005; 65:306-10.
12. Shaw K, Urdí R, Gorelick M. Pediatric emergency department directors' benchmarking survey: Fiscal year 2001. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004; 19:143-7.
13. Salter R, Maconochie IK. Implementation of recommendations for the care of children in UK emergency departments: national postal questionnaire survey. BMJ; 2005; 330:73-4.
14. Gausche-Hill M, Schmitz C, Lewis R. Pediatric Prepardness of US Emergency Departments: a 2003 Survey. Pediatrics. 2007; 120:1229-37.
15. Mintegui S, Shavit I, Benito J. The Organizational Structure of The European Paediatric Emergency Department: A Descriptive Pilot Study. Comunicación oral. 4th Mediterranean Congress of emergency Medicine in collaboration with the American Academy of Emergency Medicine. Sorrento. 2007.
16. Murphy K. Pediatric Triage Guidelines. St Louis: Mosby; 1997.
17. Warren D, Jarvis A, Leblanc L. The National Triage Task Force members. Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale: Implementation guidelines for emergency departments. Can J Emerg Med. 2001; 3:1-27.
18. Bello O. Organización de un Departamento de Emergencias Pediátricas- Pediatr. 1998; 25:5-9.
19. Galaz T. César, Valladares G. Yanett, Sánchez G. Gabriela, Fuente H. María de la, Yentzen M. Gladys. Triage pediátrico: un sistema efectivo de priorización en los servicios de urgencia. Rev. chil. pediatr. [revista en la Internet]. 2005 Ene [citado Septiembre de 2009]; 76(1): 25-33. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0370-41062005000100003&lng=es
20. Thomas D. Special considerations for pediatric Triage in the emergency department. Nurs Clin North Am. 2004; 37:145-59.
21. Dieckman RA. Epidemiology of pediatric emergency care. Illustrated Textbook of Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care Procedures. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2004:3-7.
22. Dieckmann RA. Evaluación pediátrica. En: Manual de referencia para la emergencia y la urgencia pediátricas. t-1. EU: ACINDES; 2007. p.21-48.
23. Hazinski MF. Pediatric Advanced Life Support Manual. Dallas, Tx: American Herat Association; 2004.
24. Dieckmann RA. Pediatric Education for Prehospital Professionals. 2nd Ed. Sudbury, Mass:American Academy of Pediatric, Jones and Barlett Publisher; 2006.
25. Roback MG, Teach SJ. Pediatric Resuscitation: A Practical Approach. Dallas, Tex: American Collage of Emergency Physicians; 2005.
26. Canetti Fernández S. La evaluación clínica del niño. En Pediatría 2 Editorial Ciencias Médicas. 2004.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/