Prediction of fetal sex in the first quarter ultrasound screening: ecuadorian experience

Authors

Keywords:

DIAGNÓSTICO PRENATAL; EMBARAZO; PRIMER TRIMESTRE DEL EMBARAZO; ULTRASONOGRAFÍA PRENATAL., PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, FIRST; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL., DIAGNÓSTICO PRÉ-NATAL; GRAVIDEZ, PRIMEIRO; TRIMESTRE DA GRAVIDEZ; ULTRASSONOGRAFIA PRÉ-NATAL.

Abstract

Introduction: early prediction of fetal sex constitutes a relevant support in first-trimester screening, especially in contexts where genetic testing is not accessible and ultrasound represents the main diagnostic resource available.

Objective: to determine the accuracy of first-trimester ultrasound in predicting fetal sex through sagittal evaluation of the genital tubercle and its anatomical orientation.

Methods: descriptive, multicenter, prospective longitudinal study conducted on an intentional sample of 105 pregnant women attended at two specialized centers between 2021 and 2023. Ultrasound sex determination was based on the angle of the genital tubercle relative to the lumbosacral line, compared with confirmatory results from the second trimester or at birth. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were employed.

Results: initially, 52,4 % of fetuses were estimated to be female. Male prediction reached an accuracy of 94 %, while female prediction obtained 83,6 %. The overall effectiveness of the protocol was 88,5 %, with statistically significant associations between the initial assignment and the definitive sex.

Conclusions: the orientation of the genital tubercle is a reliable predictor of fetal sex during the first trimester, demonstrating high accuracy in this Latin American population. These findings support the usefulness of the ultrasound approach as an accessible alternative in clinical contexts where early genetic testing is not available.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Efrat Z, Perri T, Ramati E, Tugendreich D, Meizner I. Fetal gender assignment by first‐trimester ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2006[citado: 30/11/2025]; 27(6): 619–21. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.2674

2. Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Torchia MG. Embriología Clínica. 11a ed. Elsevier[Internet]; 2020[citado: 30/11/2025]. Disponible en: https://shop.elsevier.com/books/embriologia-clinica/moore/978-84-9113-590-6

3. Gonzalez Ballano I, Saviron Cornudella R, Cisneros Gimeno A, Lerma Puertas D, Pérez Pérez P, Montañes Bello P, et al. Ultrasound measurement learning of fetal sex during the first trimester: does the experience matter? Res Rep Focus Ultrasound [Internet]. 2015[citado: 30/11/2025]; 3: 19-23. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/rrfu.s88738

4. Sadler TW. Embriología Médica de Langman. 15a ed. Filadelfia, PA, Estados Unidos de América: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2023[citado: 30/11/2025]. Disponible en: https://www.wolterskluwer.com/es/solutions/lippincott-medicine/langman-embiologia-medica

5. Bruce MC. Human Embryology and Developmental Biology. 5th Edition. Elsevier[Internet]; 2013[citado: 30/11/2025]. Disponible en: https://shop.elsevier.com/books/human-embryology-and-developmental-biology/carlson/978-1-4557-2794-0

6. Peral Camacho JI, Lepe Balselobre E, Sáinz-Bueno JA, Mora Ortiz A. Influencia del sexo fetal en los marcadores de riesgo utilizados en el cribado prenatal de trisomía 21. Rev Lab Clin[Internet]. 2018[citado: 30/11/2025]; 11(1): 73-78. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-del-laboratorio-clinico-282-articulo-influencia-del-sexo-fetal-marcadores-S1888400817301150

7. Sipahi M, Tokgöz VY. Alanya Tosun Ş. An appropriate way to predict fetal gender at first trimester: anogenital distance. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2019[citado: 30/11/2025]; 32(12): 2012–16. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1424131

8. Alfuraih AM, Alotaiby SA, Alsaadi MJ, Bukhari HA, Aldhebaib AM, Mohtasib RS. Predictive value and reference ranges of anogenital distance for determining fetal gender in the first trimester: A retrospective cohort study: A retrospective cohort study. Saudi Med J[Internet]. 2021[citado: 30/11/2025]; 42(10): 1057–64. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2021.42.10.20210468

9. Nouri S, Kalantar MH, Safi F, Almasi-Hashiani A. The role of fetal heart rate in first trimester sonograms in prediction of fetal sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2023[citado: 30/11/2025]; 23(1): 582. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05908-8

10. Kurban Y, Uyar I, Alan M, Hacifazlioglu C. Fetal sex prediction measuring yolk sac size and yolk sac-fetal pole distance in the first trimester via ultrasound screening. J Ultrasound [Internet]. 2020[citado: 30/11/2025]; 24(4): 489–92. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40477-020-00516-0

11. Bogers H, Rifouna MS, Koning AHJ, Husen-Ebbinge M, Go ATJI, van der Spek PJ, et al. Accuracy of fetal sex determination in the first trimester of pregnancy using 3D virtual reality ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound [Internet]. 2018[citado: 30/11/2025]; 46(4): 241–6. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22551

12. Manzanares S, Benítez A, Naveiro-Fuentes M, López-Criado MS, Sánchez-Gila M. Accuracy of fetal sex determination on ultrasound examination in the first trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound [Internet]. 2016[citado: 30/11/2025]; 44(5): 272–7. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22320

Published

2025-12-11

How to Cite

1.
Padilla Barragán DE, Moreno-Vargas JA, Moreno-Vargas OM. Prediction of fetal sex in the first quarter ultrasound screening: ecuadorian experience. Rev Ciencias Médicas [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 11 [cited 2026 Jan. 3];29(1):e6949. Available from: https://revcmpinar.sld.cu/index.php/publicaciones/article/view/6949

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES