Indicators for the effectiveness of genetic counselling
Keywords:
Genetic counselling, Ethics, Psychology, Methods.Abstract
A descriptive, cross-sectional study and the analysis of indicators for effectiveness were conducted in Pinar del Rio municipality during the periods of 2003-2005 and 2006-2008. Fifty (50) families attending to genetic services for several reasons were chosen by a non-probabilistic sampling. An interview that comprised a series of tools to evaluate the behavior of the variables associated with the effectiveness of genetic counselling was carried out considering, elective abortion as well as opinions about genetic center services, among others. This study showed a high percentage in qualifying the level of knowledge as good, which assessed the effectiveness of genetic counselling, a great proportion justified abortion expressing social or ethical motivations, they as well considered prenatal studies for couples with risks of having children suffering from genetic diseases, as a priority.Downloads
References
1. Colectivo de autores. Por la vida: Estudio psicosocial de las personas con discapacidades y estudio psicopedagógico, social y clínico-genético de las personas con retraso mental en Cuba. Ciudad de la Habana: Casa Editora Abril; 2003. p.152.
2. Hunter A, Collins J, Deardorff M, Krantz I. Detailed assessment of the ear in Cornelia de Lange syndrome: Comparison with a control sample using the new dysmorphology guidelines. American Journal of Medical Genetics A[internet]. 2009[cited]; 149A(10):2181-92. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2764032/
3. Offiah A, Alman B, Cornie A, Giampietro P, Tassy O, Wade A. Pilot assessment of a radiologic classification system for segmentation defects of the vertebrae. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A[internet].2010[cited]; 152(6): 1357-1371. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.a.33361/abstract;jsessionid=D94BB4363C0252B72F8F27B232301FEA.d03t01
4. Burke W, Culver J, Pinsky L, Hall S, Reynolds S, Yasui Y. Genetic assessment of breast cancer risk in primary care practice.American Journal of Medical Genetics A[internet]. 2009[cited]; 149A (3): 349-356. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2688688/
5. Rojas Betancourt I. Prevención de las enfermedades genéticas y asesoramiento genético. En: Lantigua Cruz A. Introducción a la genética médica. La Habana: ECIMED; 2006: 245-269.
6. Cohen J, Biesecker B. Quality of life in rare genetic conditions: A systematic review of the literature. American Journal of Medical Genetics A[internet]. 2010[cited]; 152A(5):1136-1156. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3113481/
7. Marcheco B. La Genética en Salud Pública: El Desafío del acceso de todos a los beneficios. Rev Cubana Genet Comunit[internet]. 2007[cited]; 1(1):5-6. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/rcgc/v1n1/gcoed107.pdf
8. Nissell A, Forbes R, Bankier A, Hughes E, Aitken MA. Consumer contribution to the delivery of genetic health services. American Journal of Medical Genetics A[internet]. 2008[cited]; 146A(17): 2266-74. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.a.32271/pdf
9. McAllister M , Davies L, Payne K, Nicholls S, Donnai D, MacLeod R. The emotional effects of genetic diseases: Implications for clinical genetics. American Journal of Medical Genetics [internet]. 2007[cited]; 143A(22): 2651-2661. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.a.32013/pdf

Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/