Quality in Public Health System
Keywords:
Quality management, Public health, Patient safety.Abstract
This literature review was carried out to encourage health personnel to the implementation of “Management of Quality” systems, getting familiar with some of the most important elements of the quality in health services. A review about the elements of quality and the importance to implement the “Management of Quality” systems was carried out in health units, highlighting the difficulties found in international studies regarding medical security and organization of medical services. The need of formulating the indicators to evaluate the processes in health services was considered.Downloads
References
1. Kaoru I. ¿Qué es el Control Total de la Calidad? Ciudad de la Habana: Editorial Ciencias Sociales; 1988.
2. Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham I D, Zwarenstein M, Bhattacharyya O, Sheooerd S. Monitoring use of knowledge and evaluating outcomes. CMAJ February 9, 2010. 182(2): E94-E98.
3. Braun JP, Mende H, Bause H, Bloos F, Geldner G, Kastrup M, Kuhlen, et al. Quality indicators in intensive care medicine: why? Use or burden for the intensivist. Ger. Med. Sci. 2010; 8.
4. Carayon P. Patient Safety: The Role of Human Factors and Systems Engineering. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010; p.153:23-46.
5. Bloomfield E. The Ethics of Rationing of Critical Care Services: Should Technology Assessment Play a Role? Anesthesiol Res Pract[internet]. 2009[cited january 2012]; 2009: Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2925216/pdf/ARP2009-915197.pdf
6. Braun JP, Bause H, Bloos F, Geldner G, Kastrup M, Kuhlen R, Markewitz A, Martin J et als. Peer reviewing critical care: a pragmatic approach to quality management. Ger Med Sci 2010; 8:
7. Howlett J, McKelvie R S, Costigan J, Ducharme A, Estrella-Holder E, Ezekowitz J A, Giannetti N, et als. The 2010 Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure update: Heart failure in ethnic minority populations, heart failure and pregnancy, disease management, and quality improvement/assurance programs. Can J Cardiol. 2010 April; 26(4): 185-202.
8. Moreno R, Rhodes A, Donchin J. Patient safety in intensive care medicine: the Declaration of Vienna. Intensive Care Med. 2009 October; 35(10): 1667-1672.
9. Tjia J, Mazor K, Field T, Meterko V, Spenard A, Grwitz H. Nurse-Physician Communication in the Long-Term Care Setting: Perceived Barriers and Impact on Patient Safety. J Patient Saf. 2009, September; 5(3): 145-152.
10. El-Jardali F, Dimassi H, Jamal D, Jaafar M, Hemadeh N. Predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture in hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11:45
11. Livingston E. Solutions for Improving Patient Safety. JAMA 2010; 303(2): p.159-161.
12. Joosten T, Bongers I, Janssen R. Application of lean thinking to health care: issues and observations. Int Qual Health Care. 2009 October; 21(5): 341-347.
13. Calligaris L, Panzera A, Arnoldo L, Londero C, Quattrin R, Troncon M, Busaferro S. Errors and omissions in hospital prescriptions: a survey of prescription writing in a hospital. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2009; 9:9.
14. Benning A, Ghaleb M, Suokas a, Dixon-Woods A, Dawson J. Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals: mixed method evaluation. BMJ. 2011; 342:p. 195.
15. Hyzy R, Flanders S A, Pronovost P, Berenholtz S M, Watson S, George C, Goeschel C A, Maselli J, Auerbach A. Characteristics of intensive care units in Michigan: Not an open and closed case. J Hosp Med. 2010 January; 5(1): 4-9.
16. Benning A, Dixon-Woods M, Ghaleb M, Nwulu U, Dawson J, Barber N, Franklin B D. Multiple component patient safety intervention in English hospitals: controlled evaluation of second phase. BMJ. 2011; 342: 199.
17. Lipitz-Snyderman A, Steinwachs D, Needham D M, Colantuoni E, Morlock L L, Pronovost P. Impact of a statewide intensive care unit quality improvement initiative on hospital mortality and length of stay: retrospective comparative analysis. BMJ. 2011; 342: d319.
18. Yasaitis L, Fisher E L, Skinner J, Chandra A. Hospital Quality And Intensity Of Spending: Is There An Association? Health Aff (Millwood) 2009 Jul-Aug; 28(4): w566-w572.
19. Pomey M-P, Lemieux-Charles L, Champagne F, Angus D, Shaba A, Contandriopoulos A-P. Does accreditation stimulate change? A study of the impact of the accreditation process on Canadian healthcare organizations. Implement Sci. 2010; 5:31.
20. Hutchings A, Durand M A, Grieve R, Harrison D, Rowan K, Green J, Cairns J, Black N. Evaluation of modernization of adult critical care services in England: time series and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2009; 339: b4353.
21. Vandijck D, Blot S, Vogelaers D P. Implementation of an evidence-based sepsis program in the intensive care unit: evident or not? Crit Care. 2009; 13(5): 193.
22. Milstein A, Lee T H. Comparing Physicians on Efficiency. N En Med. December 27, 2007; 357:2649-2652. 23. Auerbach A, Landefeld C S, Shojania K G. The Tension between Needing to Improve Care and Knowing How to Do It. N En Med. August 9 2007; 357: 608-613.
24. Mathews S C, Pronovost P J. Physician Autonomy and Informed Decision Making Finding the Balance for Patient Safety and Quality. JAMA. 2008; 300(24): 2913-2915.
25. Dormann H, Diesch K, Ganslandt T, Hahn E H. Numerical Parameters and Quality Indicators in a Medical Emergency Department. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 April; 107(15): 261-267.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/