Assessment of the graduates of Master in Medical Education at Pinar del Río University of Medical Sciences
Keywords:
EDUCATION, MEDICAL, OVERCOMING, CREDENTIALING, EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, QUALITY.Abstract
Introduction: Master's Degree in Medical Education started in Pinar del Río School of Medical Sciences in 2009, since then, a group of professors of both Basic and Clinical Sciences has graduated, increasing the quality of the Teaching-Learning Process in all branches of the medical education in the province.
Objective: to evidence the achievements obtained in the Province as a result of the teaching of the Master’s degree in Medical Education in its first two editions, its impact on the professional performance and the development of the Teaching-Learning Process, in different teaching settings.
Methods: materialist-dialectic method was applied as the main one, logical-historical theoretical and the structural systemic approach, along with documentary reviews that were applied as empirical systems.
Development: it is shown how the graduates of the first two editions of the Master’s degree in Medical Education at Pinar del Río School of Medical Sciences in 2009, achieved an increase in both professional and academic quality, obtaining higher scientific and teaching ranks, in the production of publications, participation in events, gaining awards, and the contribution to the rise of the teaching-learning process in its different subjects for the satisfaction of the health institutions where they offer their services.
Conclusions: the Master's Degree edition in Medical Education at Pinar del Río School of Medical Sciences in 2009, has allowed the enhancement of the quality of graduates, showing its relevance and the need of continuity as a type of professional training, allowing its accreditation in 2017.
Downloads
References
1. Calidad en la Educación Superior. El camino a la prosperidad. Educación Superior Boletín [Internet]. 2012 Mar [citado 4/12/2018]; 19. Disponible en: https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/articles-92779_archivo_pdf_Boletin19.pdf
2. Acreditación [Internet]. Lima, Perú: Sistema Nacional de Evaluación, Acreditación y Certificación de la Calidad Educativa; 2017 [citado 4/12/2018]. Disponible en: https://www.sineace.gob.pe/acreditacion/
3. Cunill López ME, Oramas González R, Márquez Morales N. Experiencias en evaluación y acreditación de programas de maestrías. Educación Médica Superior [Internet]. 2016 Abr-Jun [citado 4/12/2018]; 30(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21412016000200006
4. Autoevaluación con fines de acreditación y cultura de la calidad en la educación superior de Costa Rica [Internet]. 2015 [citado 4/12/2018]. Disponible en: http://www.aneaes.gov.py/aneaes/datos/ Mecanismo/01_Mecanismo_de_evaluacion_institucional.pdf
5. Addine F. Evaluación de la mejora continua de la calidad y su sostenibilidad [Internet]. 2013 [citado 4/12/2018]. Disponible: https://es.scribd.com/ doc/176106955/Fatima-Addine-Fernandez-y-Coautores-Principios-Para-La-Direccion-Del-Proceso-Pedagogico
6. Díaz Rojas PA, Leyva Sánchez E, Borroto Cruz R, Vicedo Tomey A. Impacto de la maestría en Educación Médica Superior en el desarrollo docente de sus egresados. Educ Med Super [Internet]. 2014 Jul-Set [citado 10/9/2018]; 28(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21412014000300013
7. Jaramillo Salazar H. La formación de posgrado en Colombia: maestrías y doctorados. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad – CTS [Internet]. 2009 Sep [citado 10/9/2018]; 5(13). Disponible en: http://www.revistacts.net/files/Volumen%205%20-%20n%FAmero%2013/jaramillo.pdf
8. Roque Cala K, Pulido Díaz A. La comunicación oral pedagógica en la formación de profesionales. Rev Ciencias Médicas [Internet]. 2018 [citado 4/12/2018]; 22(3). Disponible en: http://revcmpinar.sld.cu/index.php/publicaciones/article/view/3396
9. Díaz Campos N, Macías LLanes ME, Falcón Fariñas IN. Evaluación de la pertinencia social del programa de maestría Humanidades Médicas. Rev Hum Med [Internet]. 2016 Dic [citado 22/11/2018]; 16(3): [aprox. 28p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727-81202016000300005&lng=es
10. Lemus González DR, Valdés Vento AC, Leal Flores A. Fundamentos teóricos
del sistema de indicadores, variable pertinencia e impacto social en bioanálisis Clínico. Revista de Ciencias Médicas Pinar del Río [Internet]. 2018 Oct [citado 22/11/2018]; 22(5): [aprox. 10p.]. Disponible en: http://www.revcmpinar.sld.cu/index.php/publicaciones/article/view/3471/pdf
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/
