System of indicators to assess the relevance and social impact in the bachelor's degree in clinical bioanalysis
Keywords:
HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS, EDUCATION, HIGHER, TEACHING, MEDICAL, QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE.Abstract
Introduction: in the documentary review prior to the self-assessment of the degree in Clinical Bioanalysis with a view to accreditation, the particularities related to the pertinence and social impact of it are not described, which makes it possible to objectively assess this variable, not even the indicators are taken into account that reflect the aspects related to the professional profile declared in the program of study of this degree and the quality of the professional performance of the graduate.
Objective: to design a system of indicators for the assessment of the pertinence and social impact in the Bachelor's degree in Clinical Bioanalysis at Dr. Ernesto Che Guevara de la Serna School f Medical Sciences in Pinar del Río.
Methods: the dialectical materialist was the method used as the guiding one, along with theoretical methods: historical and logical, modeling, induction-deduction, empirical approaches: documentary review, survey, interview, expert judgment and statistical-descriptive method.
Results: the system of indicators to evaluate pertinence and social impact on the training of the degree of Clinical Bioanalysis, theoretically sustained on foundations from the educational sciences that made it possible, with the determination of indicators that respond to the model of the professional in this modality. The criterion of experts with the application of the Delphi method was transcendent for the validation of the system.
Conclusions: a system of indicators was developed to evaluate the variable relevance and social impact in the Bachelor's degree of Clinical Bioanalysis with a systemic and contextualized approach, which constitutes an instrument that allows the evaluation of the relevance and impact of the graduate.
Downloads
References
1- Borroto Cruz ER, Salas Perea RS. “La acreditación y los créditos académicos como base de la calidad universitaria. Experiencia cubana”. Educ Med Super [Internet]. 2000 Abr [citado 28/11/2017]; 14( 1 ): 48-55. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21412000000100007&lng=es.
2- Betancourt Villalba A. La gestión pedagógica del colectivo de carrera ante los nuevos enfoques de los procesos universitarios en Cuba. Avances. 2007; 9(3):1-10. http://www.ciget.pinar.cu/Revista/No.2007-3/art%EDculo3/Art%EDculo%20%28Modelo%20de%20gesti%F3n%29%20para%20la%20Revista%20Avances.pdf
3- CAMPO SAAVEDRA MF. Calidad en la Educación Superior. El camino a la prosperidad. Boletín Educación Superior [Internet]. Marzo 2012 [citado 2017 Nov 28]; 19. Disponible en: https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/articles-92779_archivo_pdf_Boletin19.pdf
4- Boelen C. Prospects for change in medical education in thetwenty-firstcentury. AcadMed 1995; 70(7 suppl): S21-s28.
5- Cuba. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Plan de acción para incrementar la calidad de los recursos humanos en salud. Anexo Resolución Ministerial No. 142, 1996.
6- Ministerio de Salud Pública. Área de docencia e investigación. Generalidades de la nueva estructura de carreras en Tecnologías de la Salud (información preliminar) La Habana: editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2010.
7- Acosta García I. Software educativo para la enseñanza de los contenidos de Hematología en la asignatura Procedimientos Técnicos Convencionales de la carrera de Bioanálisis clínico. [tesis para optar por el grado de Máster en Educación Médica]. Cuba; 2014.
8- República de Cuba. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Plan de Acción para incrementar la Calidad de Recursos Humanos en Salud. Resolución Ministerial No. 142; 1996.
9- Suárez Rosas L, Barrios Osuna I, González Espíndola ME. Sistema de evaluación y acreditación para la carrera de estomatología. Rev. HabanCiencMéd [Internet]. 2008 Jun [citado 2017 Nov 28]; 7(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729-519X2008000200015
10- Ministerio de Educación Superior de la República de Cuba, Sistema de Evaluación y Acreditación de Carreras Universitarias. (SEA-CU) Resolución Ministerial No. 116/2002.
11- Arnold M, Osorio F. Introducción a los conceptos básicos de la teoría general de los sistemas. Facultad de Cssocial. Chile; 1998. Disponible en: http://repositorio.uchile.cl/bitstream/handle/2250/121598/Introduccion_a_los_conceptos.pdf?sequence=1
12- Valle Lima A, Pla López R. Resultados Científicos de la investigación Pedagógica en la Secundaria básica. Su estructuración Educativa. Ministerio de Educación. 2011. Disponible en: http://www.cubaeduca.cu/media/www.cubaeduca.cu/medias/pdf/2866.pdf
13- Addine Fernández F. Evaluación de la calidad en las instituciones de educación superior cubanas. Rev Congreso Universidad[Internet]. 2017[citado 20/2/2017]; 6(1): Disponible en: http://www.congresouniversidad.cu/revista/index.php/rcu/article/view/810/764
14 - Valdés Vento AC, Criterios de evaluación y aspectos específicos para evaluar la variable pertinencia e impacto social de la carrera de medicina en la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río. [Tesis]. Cuba; 2008.
15- Lemaitre, María José, Antecedentes, situación actual y perspectivas de la Evaluación y la Acreditación de la Educación Superior en Chile, Informe Nacional de Chile para IESALC/UNESCO, Santiago de Chile, 2003.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/
