Theoretical-methodological foundations on risk management associated with nursing care to the critically-ill patients
Keywords:
NURSING, MANAGEMENT, RISK, ETHICS, BIOETHICS.Abstract
Introduction: the scientific development regarding the medical technology achieved in recent years, the multiple procedures and invasive techniques to which patients are subjected during their stay in intensive care units, associated with risks and adverse events. In a general sense, the role of nursing professionals is considered of vital importance in this topic, especially in the ICU, where they can contribute in an efficient and effective way to the management of health care risks.
Objective: to base the theoretical-methodological and ethical referents of risk management associated with nursing care in Intensive Care Units.
Methods: in the research Materialistic-Dialectic method was applied as the main one. In the theoretical order, the method of historical-logical analysis was analyzed applying theoretical-methodological and ethical references of the risk management process related to the nursing care of patient, as well as the analysis-synthesis and induction-deduction procedures.
Development: the term risk management was conceptualized, determining the stages, importance and role of nursing in the development of this process, establishing the relationship with the principles of ethics and bioethics.
Conclusions: clinical risk management in emergency care is an important methodological tool for the early identification and management of such events, a space in which nursing personnel play an essential role, with deep ethical and bioethical implications in the act of caring.
Downloads
References
1. Xunta de Galicia Servicio Gallego de Salud. Sistema de Seguridad del Paciente y Gestión de Riesgos Sanitarios. [Internet] Santiago de Compostela; 2014.
2. Kelly D, Kutney-Lee A, Lake ET. The critical care work environment and nurse-reported health care–associated infections. Am J CritCare [internet]. 2013 [citado 28/01/2019]; 22(6): [aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996829/
3. Zoboli ELCP, Schveitzer MC. Nursing values as social practice: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2013 [citado 28/01/2019]; 21(3): [aprox. 8p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692013000300695&lng=en.
4. Araújo FP, Ferreira MA. Social representations of care humanization in the conception of hospitalized users. RevBrasEnferm [Internet]. 2011 [citado 28/01/2019]; 64(2): [aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-12902013000300016.
5. Da Silva RC, de Assunção Ferreira M, Apostolidis T, Sauthier M. Nursing care practices in intensive care: An analysis according to ethics of responsibility. Esc. Anna Nery [Internet]. 2016 [citado 28/01/2019]; 20(4). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1414-81452016000400212&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
6. Del Río Sánchez MB. Manual de Cuidados Enfermeros en la UCI. Madrid: Editorial SEP; 2017. p.13-38
7. Barbosa SFF, Mello JF. Cultura de segurança do paciente em terapia intensiva: recomendações da enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enfermagem [Internet]. 2013 [citado 28/01/2019]; 33(1124). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072013000400031
8. Lacoma F. Seguridad del paciente crítico: la cultura de seguridad más allá de la UCI. Rev Calidad Asistencial [Internet]. 2008 [citado 28/01/2019]; 23(4): [aprox. 30p.]. Disponible en: http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-calidad-asistencial-256-articulo-seguridad-del-paciente-critico-cultura-S1134282X08721250
9. Martínez López FJ, Ruiz Ortega JM. Manual de gestión de riesgos sanitarios. Madrid: Ediciones Díaz de Santos; 2001. p. 226-8.
10. Gómiz León E. El profesional de enfermería, por la gestión del riesgo, hacia la seguridad del paciente. RevSocEspEnfermNefrol [eInternet]. 2007 [citado 28/01/2019]; 10(1): [aprox. 1p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/nefro/v10n1/carta.pdf
11. León Román CA. La seguridad del paciente, una responsabilidad en el acto del cuidado. Rev Cubana Enferm [Internet]. 2006 [citado 28/01/2019]; 22(3):[aprox 11 p.]. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/enf/vol22_3_06/enf07306.html
12. Mora Guillart L. Los principios éticos y bioéticos aplicados a la calidad de la atención en enfermería. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28/01/2019]; 28(2): [aprox. 5p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762015000200009&lng=es.
13. Gómez Córdoba AI, Espinosa AF. Dilemas éticos frente a la seguridad del paciente. Cuidar es pensar. Aquichan [Internet]. 2009 [citado 28/01/2019]; 6(1). Disponible en: http://aquichan.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/aquichan/article/view/80/165
14. Vera Carrasco O. Aspectos bioéticos en la atención de los pacientes de las unidades de cuidados intensivos. Rev. Méd [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28/01/2019]; 21(1). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-89582015000100009
15. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, justice. En: Beuchamp TL, Childress JF, editors. Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford UniversityPress, 1994. P.120-394.
16. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Pacientes en Defensa de su Seguridad [Internet] m OMO; 2019 [citado 28/01/2019]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/patients_for_patient/statement/es/index.html
17. Santos-Pérez MI, García-Rodicio S, Abajo del Álamo C. Conocimiento de los tratamientos en pacientes hospitalarios: herramienta necesaria para la seguridad asistencial. Rev Calidad Asistencial [Internet]. 2012 [citado 28/01/2019]; 27(5): [aprox. 4p.]. Disponible en: http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-calidad-asistencial-256-articulo-conocimiento-los-tratamientos-pacientes-hospitalarios-S1134282X12000085
18. Vargas MAO, Ramos FRS. Iatrogenesis in Intensive Care Units: dramatization of contemporary bio/ethical problems. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2010 [citado 28/01/2019]; 18(5): [aprox. 10p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692010000500021&lng=en.
19. Duarte SCM, Queiroz ABA, Büscher A, Stipp MAC. Human error in daily intensive nursing care. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28/01/2019]; 23(6): [aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692015000601074&lng=en
20. Sholtz S, Nel EW, Poggenpoel M, Myburgh C. The culture of nurses in a critical care unit. Glob Qual Nurs Res [Internet]. 2016 [citado 28/01/2019]; 3. Disponible en: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2333393615625996
21. Almeida Barcellos R, Toscan M, PrettoBáo AC, Coelho AmestoyS. Effectiveness of clinical risk management in intensive care. Cogitare Enferm [Internet]. 2016 [citado 28/01/2019]; 21(1-8). Disponible en: https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/download/45205/pdf_1
22. Gómez Córdoba AI, Fernanda Espinosa A. Ethical Dilemmas Facing the Patient's Safety: Care means Ponder. Aquichan [Internet]. 2009 [citado 28/01/2019]; 68(1). Disponible en: http://aquichan.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/aquichan/article/view/80/165
23. Escobar-Castellanos B, Cid-Henríquez P. El cuidado de enfermería y la ética derivados del avance tecnológico en salud. Acta bioeth [Internet]. 2018 [citado 28/01/2019]; 24(1). Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-569X2018000100039 - B25
24. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System [Internet]. Washington: National Academies Press; 2000 [citado 28/01/2019]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25077248
25. Ward JR, Clarkson PJ. An analysis of medical device-related errors: prevalence and possible solutions. J MedEngTechnol [Internet]. 2004 [citado 28/01/2019]; 28(1): [aprox. 9p.]. Disponible en: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0309190031000123747
26. Mattox E. Medical Devices and Patient Safety. CritCare Nurse [Internet]. 2012 [citado 28/01/2019]; 32(4): [aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/content/32/4/60.full
27. Institute ECRI. Top 10 health technology hazards for 2013.Health Devices [enlínea]. 2012 [citado 28/01/2019]; 41(11). Disponible en: https://www.ecri.org/Resources/Whitepapers_and_reports/2013_Health_Devices_Top_10_Hazards.pdf
28. Rangel Ribeiro GD, Celestino da Silva R, Assunção Ferreira M, Rezende da Silva G. Violaciones en el uso de equipo por las enfermeras en la unidad de terapia intensiva. Texto contexto –enferm [Internet]. 2017 [citado 28/01/2019]; 26(2). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072017000200315
29. Bridi AC, Silva RCL, Louro TQ. Alarmas clínicas en terapia intensiva: implicaciones de la fatiga de alarmas para la seguridad del paciente. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2014 [citado 28/01/2019]; 22(6): [aprox. 10p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v22n6/es_0104-1169-rlae-22-06-01034.pdf
30. Morales Sánchez C, Murillo Pérez MA, Torrente Vela S. Auditoría de las alarmas del monitor de cabecera en una unidad de cuidados críticos. Enfermería Intensiva [en línea]. 2014 [citado 28/01/2019]; 25(3): [aprox. 20p.]. Disponible en: http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-enfermeria-intensiva-142-articulo-auditoria-las-alarmas-del-monitor-S1130239914000327
31. Kuerten Rocha P, do Prado ML, Almeida Cabral PF, Jatobá de Souza AI, Anders JC. El cuidado y la tecnología en las unidades de cuidados intensivos. IndexEnferm [Internet]. 2013 [citado 28/01/2019]; 22(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962013000200009
32. Rangel Ribeiro GD, Celestino da Silva R, Assunção Ferreira M. Technologies in intensive care: causes of adverse events and implications to nursing. Rev. Bras. Enferm [Internet]. 2016 [citado 28/01/2019]; 69(5). Disponible en:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0034-71672016000500972&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
33. Fernández-Castelló AI, Valle-Pérez P, Pagonessa-Damonte ML, Blazquez-Muñoz M, Tomás JF. Anexperience in integrated management of clinical risks. Journal of Healthcare Quality Research [Internet]. 2018 [citado 28/01/2019]; 33(6): [aprox. 20p.]. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647918300836
34. Bassuni EM, Bayoumi MM. Improvement Critical Care Patient Safety: Using Nursing Staff Development Strategies, At Saudi Arabia. Glob J Health Sci [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28/01/2019]; 7(2): [aprox. 8p.]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796447/
35. Meneses Oliveira R, de Arruda Leitão ID, Sales da Silva L. Strategies for promoting patient safety: from the identification of the risks to the evidence-based practices. Esc. Anna Nery [Internet]. 2014 [citado 28/01/2019]; 18(1). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1414-81452014000100122&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
36. Françolin L, Gabriel CS, Bernardes A. Patient safety management from the perspective of nurses. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28/01/2019]; 49(2). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000200277
37. Milos P, Larraín AI. La vinculación ético-jurídica entre la gestión del cuidado y la gestión de riesgos en el contexto de la seguridad del paciente. Aquichan [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28/01/2019]; 15(1): [aprox. 12p.]. Disponible en: http://aquichan.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/aquichan/article/view/2935/3764
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/
