Analysis of the scientific production published by the Journal of Medical Sciences of Pinar del Rio, 2012-2021
Keywords:
SOFTWARE, BIBLIOMETRICS, BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS, SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION INDICATORS, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION INDICATORS, JOURNAL ARTICLE.Abstract
Introduction: bibliometric constitutes a useful tool for the analysis of strengths and weaknesses of editorial management, which allows evaluating new routes of action by editorial teams.
Objective: to describe the metric indicators of the Journal of Medical Sciences of Pinar del Rio between 2012 and 2021.
Methods: observational, descriptive and bibliometric study. The target group comprised 1238 articles published in the period, studying them in totality. The information was collected from the full texts of the articles by accessing the journal's website. Variables such as the number of articles, review period, publication period and rate of variation of scientific production were studied.
Results: a total of 1238 articles were published, divided into 10 volumes and 60 issues. The most productive years were 2018 and 2016 with 136 and 133 articles respectively. A predominance of original articles was found (50,57 %); 4360 were reported, with an average of 436 authors per year and 3.52 authors per article. Finding a higher number of authors making publications in the year 2021 (488 authors). Between 2013 and 2021 a total of 2294 articles were received, the rejection rate was found to be between 2 % (2018) and 40 % (2021).
Conclusions: the journal complied with the established periods, publishing a greater number of original articles, varying both the number of articles and authors between years, with a trend to increase, as well as multiple authors per articles. There was a high rate of rejection in general.
Downloads
References
1. Martínez-Prince R, Martínez-Rodríguez A, Rodríguez-Reyes M. Sistematización teórica sobre la Identificación Temática desde los Estudios Métricos de la Información. Revista Publicando[Internet]. 2019[citado 20/01/2021]; 6(20): 12-23. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7054938
2. Revista de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río. Enfoque y alcance. Revista de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río [Internet]. Disponible en: http://www.revcmpinar.sld.cu/index.php/publicaciones/about/editorialPolicies#focusAndScope
3. González-Rodríguez R, Cardentey-García J, Izquierdo-Almora Y. Estudio bibliométrico de la Revista de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río. 2013-2015. Rev Ciencias Médicas[Internet]. 2017 [citado 20/01/2021]; 21(1): [aprox. 10 pp]. Disponible en: http://www.revcmpinar.sld.cu/index.php/publicaciones/article/view/2762
4. Hernández-Cuétara L, González-Argote J, Vitón-Castillo AA. Tendencias, colaboración e impacto de la producción científica en Web of Science sobre cáncer bucal. Rev Ciencias Médicas [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20/01/2021]; 25(3): e5013. Disponible en: http://www.revcmpinar.sld.cu/index.php/publicaciones/article/view/5013/4536
5. Gallardo-Sánchez Y, Fonseca-Arias M, Saborit-Corría E, et al. Evaluación de indicadores métricos de la Revista Médica Electrónica a través de Google Académico. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2020 Ene.-Feb. [citado: 20/01/2021]; 42(1). Disponible en: http://www.revmedicaelectronica.sld.cu/index.php/rme/article/view/2698/4647
6. Santos-Fuentefria A, Vasallo-Uffo GJ, López-Prado OB. Análisis bibliométrico de la revista Ingeniería Energética, período 2008-2018. Ingeniería Energética [Internet]. 2020[citado: 20/01/2021]; 41(2): [aprox. 11 pp]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1815-59012020000200003
7. Corrales-Reyes IE, Fornaris-Cedeño Y, Reyes-Pérez JJ. Análisis bibliométrico de la revista Investigación en Educación Médica. Periodo 2012-2016. Inv Ed Med[Internet]. 2018 [citado 20/01/2021]; 7(25): 18-26. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riem.2017.02.003
8. Madero-Durán S, Licea-Jiménez IJ, Martínez-Prince R. Perspectiva métrica en el análisis de los artículos originales de la Revista Cubana de Pediatría. Rev. cuba. inf. cienc. salud[Internet]. 2020 [citado 20/01/2021]; 31(2): e1469. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2307-21132020000200009
9. Morales-Fernández T, Martínez-Ramos AT, Rivas-Corria B, Diago-Gómez A, Clavero-Fleites L, Martínez-Bernal S, González-Moro LE. “Acta Médica del Centro”: análisis bibliométrico de la literatura científica publicada en el periodo comprendido entre 2007 y 2019. Acta Médica del Centro[Internet]. 2021 [citado 20/01/2021]; 15(2): 163-175. Disponible en: http://www.revactamedicacentro.sld.cu/index.php/amc/article/view/1417
10. Rolo-Mantilla FM, Velásquez-Godoy Y, Collado-Rolo L, Fuentes-García S, Vega-Díaz JJ, Arango-González FA. La publicación científica en Médica Electrónica. Trienio 2016-2018. Rev. Med. Electrón. [Internet]. 2019 [citado 20/01/2021]; 41(4): [aprox. 12 pp]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1684-18242019000400928
11. Corrales-Reyes I, Fornaris-Cedeño Y, Reyes-Pérez J, Valdés-Gamboa L. Aproximación cienciométrica a la producción científica de MediSur. Medisur [revista en Internet]. 2017 [citado 24/06/2019]; 15(5): [aprox. 6 p.]. Disponible en: http://medisur.sld.cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/3554
12. Martínez-Prince R, Martínez-Rodríguez A, Novo-Castro S. La colaboración científica reflejada en las investigaciones cubanas en el área de ciencias de la información: exploración desde la base de datos Scielo Citation Index. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales [Internet] 2021 [citado 12/01/2022]; 32(1):14-27. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.917
13. Pérez-Capdevila J. Aspectos esenciales sobre el arbitraje en revistas científicas. Rev Inf Cient Internet]. 2019 [citado 24/06/2019]; 98(5): [aprox. 3 p]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1028-99332019000500553
14. González-de Dios J, González-Muñóz M, Alonso-Arroyo A, Aleixandre-Benavent R. Comunicación científica (XII). Conocimientos básicos para elaborar un artículo científico (7): El sistema de revisión por pares («peer review») a debate: fortalezas y debilidades. Acta Pediatr Esp [Internet]. 2014 [citado 24/06/2019]; 72(5): 103-108. Disponible en: www.actapediatrica.com/index.php/archivo/collapse2014
15. Morales-Fernández T, Martínez-Ramos AT, Rivas-Corrías B, Diago-Gómez A, Clavero-Fleites L, Martínez-Bernal S. Producción científica de la revista EDUMECENTRO y su visibilidad a través de Google Académico. EDUMECENTRO [Internet]. 2017 [citado 24/06/2019]; 9(4):162-179. Disponible en: http://www.revedumecentro.sld.cu/index.php/edumc/article/download/1031/pdf_278
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/