Evaluation card in Clinical Propedeutics and Internal Medicine
Abstract
The evaluation of students' learning development along medical studies has been a dilemma for the medical schools and universities. During many years this evaluation was aimed at measuring knowledge acquisition in each academic discipline. Learning evaluation is an essential part of the teaching-learning process making its direction possible, as well as the control and the assessment of behavior manners that students acquire through the development of the teaching process. The strategies to learn about the development of the subjects: Clinical Propedeutics, Medical Semiology and Internal Medicine are designed to encourage students' self-training and to provide the basic tools and knowledge to develop the necessary skills. A permanent record to evaluate students' development in these subjects does not exist in the doctor's office; thus the teaching staff of the 3rd academic year at "Turcios Lima" Outpatient Teaching Clinic in Pinar del Rio (2008-2009), decided to prepare a card which includes the main aspects to be considered through the development of knowledge and skills during the stay-period with the purpose of controlling systematically and consistently the evaluation of the students' performance during the stay-period as future Comprehensive Doctors.Downloads
References
1. Pichs L A. Carpeta Metodológica del 5to Semestre Especialidad: Propedéutica Clínica y Medicina Interna. La Habana: Ministerio Educación Superior; 2006.
2. Pichs L A. Carpeta Metodológica 6to Semestre Especialidad: Medicina Interna. La Habana: Ministerio Educación Superior; 2006.
3. Salas Parea RS, Farril E, Méndez G, Colunga C. Evaluación en los Servicios de Salud de las Habilidades Clínicas de los Estudiantes del Tercer Año de Medicina. Educ Med Sup. 1993; 7(1): 39-50.
4. Oubiña J, Pérez Carballás F, Rigol O, Perea J, Fernández Sacasas J, Fernández Mirabal JE. Manual de Evaluación del Residente de Medicina General Integral. 1ª Versión. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 1986.p.11-32.
5. Salas Perea RS. El papel de la evaluación en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Educ Med Sup. 1991; 5(1): 3-17.
6. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Reglamento para la Organización del Proceso Docente Educativo en los Centros de Educación Médica Superior. Folleto. La Habana: MINSAP; 1988.
7. Salas Perea RS, Méndez G, Aneiros Riba R. Evaluación de la Competencia Clínica de los Internos en la Atención Primaria y otros Servicios de Salud. Educ Med Sup. 1993; 7(2): 85-96.
8. Ministerio de Educación. La evaluación de los estudiantes en los Institutos Superiores Pedagógicos. En: VI Seminario Nacional a dirigentes, metodólogos,
inspectores y personal de los órganos administrativos de las direcciones provinciales y municipales de Educación. 2ª Parte. La Habana: MINSAP; 1982.p.571-624.
9. Ministerio de Educación Superior. Reglamento del Trabajo Docente y Metodológico. La Habana: MINSAP; 1979.
10. González Pérez M. Sistema de Evaluación del aprendizaje de los estudiantes en la educación superior. Separata Nº 8. La Habana: Ministerio de Educación Superior; 1987.
11. Salas Perea RS. Educación en Salud: Competencia y Desempeño Profesionales. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 1993.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/
