Observational guideline to the practical examination of pediatrics for undergraduates
Keywords:
Teaching, Medical education, Pediatrics.Abstract
The practical examination is a certified evaluation carried out at the end of each stay of medical studies, it constitutes the time when the development of skills to identify and describe the symptoms and signs of patients are indispensable, as well as applying ethical and methodological principles when assessing the patients. The difficulties that have arisen in the development of this activity and the lack of homogeneity in its implementation, together with the large number of excellent evaluations to be applied, made it necessary to establish these observational guidelines for its implementation. It allows a more rigorous and objective judgment. The objective of this research is to improve the methodology for the practical examination in pediatrics subject, therefore an observational guideline and its implementation is necessary, in order to increase the quality and rigor of this activity, along with the achievement of a greater training, which is required at the end of this stay. An investigative, exploratory, descriptive and cross-sectional study was performed using the documentary analysis based on a review of the following documents: Resolution 210/07, Resolution 5/91, Syllabus of Pediatrics, National Training Program in Community-Comprehensive Medicine and scientific-participative observation methods. The use of it is a key element in the final evaluation of the course.Downloads
References
1. Fernández Sacasas J. Prologo. En: Matarama M. Diagnóstico y Tratamiento. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2011.
2. Espinosa Brito AD. La crisis del método clínico y la de la relación médico-paciente. En: La clínica y la Medicina Interna. Pasado, presente y futuro. La Habana: ECIMED; 2012.p.91-5.
3. Fernández Sacasas J. Diálogo abierto sobre el método clínico. [reseña]Granma 2011 14 de enero; sección Salud: 2 (col 3).
4. Rodríguez AJ, de la Rosa CV, García C, Casas L. Metodología para perfeccionar la realización de la discusión diagnóstica en la carrera de medicina. Rev Hum Med [Internet] 2013 [citado 12 May 2014]; 13(2): [aprox. 9 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727-81202013000200004&lang=es
5. Cabrera E, Abreu L, Notario M, Martínez A, Fernández A. Como lograr la excelencia en la asignatura de Pediatría. Panorama. Cuba y salud 2013; 8(2):52.
6. Pupo NL, Pérez Perea L, Alfonso A, Pérez Hoz G, Varcálcel B. Aspectos favorecedores y retos actuales para la misión de la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas cubana. Rev Cubana Educ Med Super, 2013; 27(1).
7. MINSAP. Resolución 5/91. Vice-Ministerio de Docencia Médica; 1991.
8. Fernández Sacasas JA. La triangulación epistemológica en la interpretación del proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje de la medicina. Revista Cubana Educ Med Super. 2012; 26(3).
9. Fortún Prieto A, Fortún Campo A, Campo Díaz MC. Objetivos y metodología de la clase práctica de Propedéutica Clínica. Rev Ciencias Médicas [Internet]. 2013 Jun [citado 12 Jun 2014]; 17(3): [aprox. 10 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1561-31942013000300016&lng=es.
10. Cañizares O, Sarasa N. Reflexiones acerca de la didáctica de los valores ético-morales en la carrera de medicina. Rev Cubana Educ Med Super [Internet].2013 citado 12 Jun 2014];27(4): [aprox. 8p.]. Dkisponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21412013000400007&lang=es
11. Santiago JT, Saínz B, Uriarte J, Martín M. La preparación metodológica de los profesores: una necesidad para la calidad del proceso docente-educativo. Panorama. Cuba y salud. 2013; 8(2):56.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/
