A critical valuation of the Anatomy III subject program applied to the university clinic
Keywords:
Evaluación Educacional, Anatomía, Universidades, Estudiantesde Medicina, Escuelas Médicas,Abstract
The University as a social institution is dedicated to create the human resources in order to develop society, reflecting its values and answering for its interests according to the historical moment and the social -cultural context A review of the program of Anatomy III was made with the purpose of validating its design according to the contents and skills as well as its quality. The general educative and instructed objects were analyzed as well as the contents and distribution of the time planned for preparation of the teaching activities, system of evaluation, methods, teaching aids and literature recommended. It is pointed out that the program has instructive educative general objectives well designed, but presents some factors causing difficulties in the development of the program, as the distance from the profile of the graduate, lacking of comprehensiveness by the members of the academic staff and fragmentary way of approaching the individual. It is recommended that the proposal be assessed by the staff,emphasizing the clinical-basic link and adding rotations in every territory, making a decentralized practical examination and considering the essence of contents for the re-structuring of the program.Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors will retain their copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a volume). Likewise, and according to the recommendations of the Medical Sciences Editorial (ECIMED), authors must declare in each article their contribution according to the CRediT taxonomy (contributor roles). This taxonomy includes 14 roles, which can be used to represent the tasks typically performed by contributors in scientific academic production. It should be consulted in monograph) whenever initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which may produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access). https://casrai.org/credit/